this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
63 points (93.2% liked)

News

22595 readers
4094 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is just going to keep getting worse. The US needs to start backing out while we still can. Let Netanyahu do what he wishes over there, just stop dragging us down with him. This would not completely abandon the Gazans, we still have the pier going up to keep sea aid flowing in.

We need a bill in Congress to begin dissolving our treaties with Israel.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Biden is claiming that the U.S. will not join Israel in a retaliatory attack on Iran. We shall see if that holds true.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Symbolically, that is good. But practically, it does not really matter.

Israel and Iran are getting into a tit-for-tat. The problem is that they disagree on who is tit and who is tat. Iran (and the US, and every honest observer) thinks both sides got their strike in and considers the matter closed. Israel seems to think they are owed a strike. The problem is that if Israel takes another strike, Iran will feel that they need to take anotherone, at which point Israel will feel the need to take another one, ... . Unless one side is willing to let the other have the last attack, this ends in war.

For it to be meaningful, Biden would need to say "The US will not back you in a war with Iran if that comes as a result of this exchange"; but I can not imagine Biden doing that.

Israel's position in this matter is transparently farcicle. What seems to be happening here is:

  1. Israel attacked an Iranian embassy.
  2. Iran attacked Israel. Most of the attack was intercepted, and Israel suffered minimal damage.
  3. Iran says "you titted, I tatted. We cool now" You are here
  4. Israel says "Perhaps you misunderstood my previous act of war. Please find enclosed a second act of war"

...

  1. Israel and Iran are at war. The US gets dragged in. Netenyahu clings to power and avoids criminal prosecution on corruption charges for a little longer.
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Unless somewhere down the line, the Israeli people find their backbone to toss Netanyahu out to the ocean. It's more likely to happen before a WW3. But nobody knows how many lives must be ruined before that point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
  1. Iran sets off a nuclear device. Russia will join in Ukraine with "They did it first!" and we're all done for.

I'm really, really starting to hate Netanjahu. I'll admit, I was wrong at the beginning of this year, saying he does what he has to. Everything Israel has done after the first two weeks after the terrorist attack is utterly ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Somehow Israel always seems to wind up in these sort of conflicts. Hmm.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Even if the US refuses to participate which I find doubtful, how much does that matter if the Israeli fighter pilots are US trained, using US equipment, aeronautics and dropping US made bombs on Iran?

I mean yes there is a difference but it just feels pedantic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

This is more related to defense but here goes.

It makes a lot of difference. Rockets cost a lot of money so they don't have unlimited numbers. The same is true for air defense systems. There's a finite number of rockets they can intercept at any given time. Hamas already discovered that limit for Iron Dome. Now think about the attack from Iran. It took rockets and jets with rockets from at least 3 militaries to stop all of them, and that was with days of warning to prepare. If Israel was fending them off alone, they wouldn't have stopped 99% of them. Now consider a 10000 rocket salvo.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

5 militaries.

Israel, Jordan, US, UK, France

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We have the numbers in what Iran says it spent, what Israel says it spent and what Israel said America spent.

35 million for Iran

Over a billion dollars for Israel

And, according to Israel, over a billion dollars for America.

The missile strike wasn't a failure. It was a huge success for Iran. The screening cruise missiles and drones were there to be destroyed so the khybar ballistic missiles with 1500kg payloads could hit their targets.

Iran notified America of when it was launching 72 hours before it did, and that is was only targeting military targets, thus limiting the potential target space that needed to be defended.

Iran spent 1/2000th of what America and Israel spent. There is no way to view that as a success for Israel, or a failure for Iran.

There is now a new calculus in the middle east where Israel will now face consequences when they attack other nations.

They are scared.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Last I checked, Israel has 0 Supercarriers, that would be the difference. Our bloated military budget has developed the largest military ever, and Israel would love to be able to use that against Iran rather than face Iran alone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Good news for them, I guess... If history is our guide, they can have as much as they want.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The US doesn’t want to pay for a war right now. I drive around freedom potholes and see freedom homeless everywhere because of the last wars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

He also said he does not support genocide. A conservative's words should never be trusted. Their actions are what matters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Something tells me not join simply means you only get US funding and weapons instead of funding, weapons, intillegence, and support vessels.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Kill some babies, maybe colonize some land, destroy a whole lot of infrastructure. The usj! This meeting sure could have been an email.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh for fuck's sake. They attacked you, the attack failed. Let it go.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Failed?

They sent just enough to get through the defense systems to make their point.

Not only did they show that they can hit Israel if they want, they can do it with precision, and while warning everyone ahead of time that it was coming.

All of that on top of the intelligence they got on 5 different countries militaries and their response times and scenarios.

FFS they underhanded a wiffleball, that Israel still almost whiffed, and now Israel is pretending they knocked it to the fences when they lucked into a bunt that went foul.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The attack succeeded, it cost 50% more to defend from. Iran could do these weekly to exhaust israel, you only have so many missiles while drones are cheap and easy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It cost a lot more than 50% to defend. Israel says it spent a billion. Israel says the US spent a billion (Though it was likely more, as it is becoming apparent that the US shot down most of the missiles successfully intercepted.)

Iran spent 35 million.

They spent 5700% more then Iran.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Putin would like to point out that it would not exhaust Israel as much as it would exhaust the U.S. We are Israel's primary defense. Which is why it's fucking outrageous that we allow them to start wars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It succeeded. The only way to view it as a failure is if you aren't paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fixed headline:
Israeli war cabinet to consider doing more war crimes after illegally bombing Iranian embassy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

If only the most militarized super power on earth didn't give decades carte blanche to a land grabbing military in order to launder government funds to weapons manufacturers while being able to attack brown people and call it 'defence'. I guess destabilizing the ME is more profitable though and boy do they want to be able yo brag about a good economy right now. Weapons and cash will contine to flow even if the US military stops aiding them, and you can set you watch to that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Should probably bomb all their hospitals, schools, and cultural sites, then round up their population and starve them. Make sure to kill all international aid workers and press that witness. Go Israel!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

"Thanks for meeting, guys... Let's see. We have all these free U.S. weapons, vehicles and delivery systems we can use. Pretty much an endless supply. So, which toys do we want to play with first?"