[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I'll speak slowly. You're going to get Trump, because this ego maniac won't step down.

This isn't a messaging problem. It won't go away by making people not talk about it. All you do is increase Trumps likelihood of winning.

Stop trying to help Trump win by ignoring senility in his opponent.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Yep, it was just a messaging problem, not a reality problem.

It certainly wasn't that Clinton ran the most incompetent campaign in my lifetime. Ignoring the Midwest swing States, even as their local Democratic parties begged for support couldn't have had anything to do with it.

Her support for war, from murdering Gaddafi and wanting to start ww3 with Russia over Syria, and voting for Iraq were all just historical notes of no importance to anyone.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

You say that as if he has dementia, which he does not. Why can’t we accept that maybe the debate was a “bad day”? Why are we pretending it’s now the norm for how he behaves?

Because it isn't a bad day. It was the standard for any time he isn't in front of a teleprompter.

Has he ever been that, though? I’m pretty sure I’ve seen him speaking as much as any other president. I mean, the Dark Brandon stuff didn’t come out from him sitting behind his desk.

This is just delusional. Biden has given the least number of news conferences since Reagan. Huh, do you remember what they were covering up with Reagan again?

Why are we pretending that Biden is a whole different person than he was even one year ago over this? It’s so insidious.

We're not. Most people just got to see what has been apparent for a while now.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Anthony Blinken is the worst secretary of state in my lifetime.

He is so incompetent that William Burns, the head of the CIA has been traveling all over the world for negotiations. Because Blinken is so bad, and not respected internationally.

Biden's foreign policy has been an absolute disaster. Aided, in part, by his choice of an incompetent cabinet.

So, I guess what I'm saying is I'd like some of what you're smoking. It seems like it is really really good for denial.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

That wasn't a stutter.

Describing it as such is such a "Don't believe your lying eyes" comment that it does more to dissuade people from your viewpoint.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

There's 25 comments here.

One idiot here is the one living in a echo-chamber because they believe anyone with a different opinion is a bot or an idiot.

P.S. Don't forget to re-enforce that echo chamber. I had an different opinion than yours on the definition of the words idiot and bot. that means I've got to be one or the other.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Sorry, I misread your comment as sarcastic.

I apologize for responding to you as I did.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

They are not bound to lose.

That is a statement that is being pushed, along with the whole Biden "Over prepared" thing as a talking point to push why we have to stick with a dementia-addled genocidal asshole.

It's simply not a true statement. You're stating an opinion as fact, and it's misleading as shit.

The second someone else gets picked is the second that they (Whoever they are) have name recognition and people will consider that person.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What does bipartisan mean again?

I apparently have to absolutely clear here:

The OP meme is mocking people claiming that the two parties are the same, because in one field (The number of convictions) they aren't.

The OP meme mockingly asks people to tell it again how the parties are the same.

I'm LITERALLY doing that. And your response is "Yep, they are the same on that issue."

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Oh, you are right about that.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.

This is wrong. He can pack the courts RIGHT NOW. The Democratic party still holds the Senate. There is no requirement for there to only be nine justices.

Edit: This does require the house changing the number of justices. So the above is incorrect.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

Convention hasn't happened yet. It literally isn't too late for that.

view more: next ›

Count042

joined 2 years ago