this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
624 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The conservative obsession with purity and control is being achieved by increasingly punitive means

The US supreme court justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas cited the Comstock Act, named after the 19th-century anti-vice campaigner Anthony Comstock, in last week’s case about access to the abortion pill mifepristone. If you don’t know who Anthony Comstock was or what his law did, that might not have alarmed you. But it should have.

The Comstock Law has come up a lot lately, and it’s part of the Republican war on sex, and to put it that way might sound overly dramatic. But there is such a war, and parts of it – against sex education, against access to birth control, against the healthcare provider Planned Parenthood and of course against abortion – have long been out in the open along with a war against the rights of women and on the rights and very existence of queer and trans people.

Comstock was reputed to be driven by religious shame over masturbation to become his era’s most extreme anti-sex crusader. He rose to prominence in the early 1870s, when he convinced Congress to make it a crime to advertise, sell or mail contraceptives or give out contraceptive information, even orally, or to mail anything “immoral” – a term whose vagueness allowed widespread prosecution, including of a feminist newspaper reporting on sexual abuse whose prominent publishers, Victoria Woodhull and Tennessee Claflin, he got sent to prison. Like modern-day rightwingers he was a book-burner, and he boasted that he had driven 15 people to suicide.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 155 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fascist movements use conservative "moral" judgement and their disgust at minority sexualities as a tool to control their ideological enemies.

It's why they hate birth control and abortion so much: they allow women to control their own lives and have a career. The Nazis also had a program to drive women out of the workforce so that men didn't have to compete with them.

It's not a coincidence; it's a plan.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Exactly. Notice how the people crying for women to have “sexual purity” rarely see women as having a place in the world beyond sex

[–] [email protected] 150 points 4 months ago (5 children)

As if that weren’t enough, in May 2023, the Heritage Foundation declared on social media, “Conservatives have to lead the way in restoring sex to its true purpose, & ending recreational sex & senseless use of birth control pills.”

Yikes 😬

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

God didn’t say “go forth and make yourself plenty”, he said “be ashamed of your genitalia and the urges I have placed deep in your psyche to reproduce, and instead tie reproduction to a legally binding document that enslaves a gender of the species”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The reason they are against birth control is at least partially because the Bible says to go and reproduce a lot. The whole point of contraception is to stop that from happening.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And it ties in with the great replacement thing. They don't want to be outnumbered by those non-white non Christian second class citizens.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of black folks are Christian too but whute Republicans wouldn't want to be outnumbered by them either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

restoring sex to its true purpose, & ending recreational sex

Looks like it's time to start training and go pro.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Wow, that is... Yeah, yikes pretty much nails it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 107 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All this "purity" talk, yet they're perfectly fine with men diddling little kids. Get off of it, you liars. It's all about control.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Diddling little girls, specifically. They think humanity was at it's peak during the Bronze Age, when women weren't considered people, they were a resource like livestock.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So they're gonna outlaw vasectomies and viagra, right?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the history of sex-obsessed conservative movements tells me that they're more likely to make vasectomies mandatory for a certain brand of person. Or, more accurately, for anyone who isn't a certain brand of person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure how that will help them subjugate women, but if they can find a connection I'm sure they will.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Reading this article, it feels like the author is just discovering the Republican party for the first time.

This is what the conservatives have been since Nixon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The Fundamentalist Christian hijacking of the Republican party started over 50 years ago, but it wasn't until Alzheimer's-ridden Ronald Reagan got into office that it was given the green light by a President.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nixon was the first symptom everyone could see, Reagan was the metastasizing, but the original infection goes all the way back through George Lincoln Rockwell, the John Birch Society, and the business plot

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No it goes all the way back to the Puritans coming over because the Catholics weren't repressing and persecuting enough for them ("they weren't hurting the people they needed to be).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Time to break out my favorite Barry Goldwater quotes:

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

And:

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!

Or:

Those who seek absolute power, even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed. Their mistaken course stems from false notions of equality, ladies and gentlemen. Equality, rightly understood, as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences. Wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism. Fellow Republicans, it is the cause of Republicanism to resist concentrations of power, private or public, which enforce such conformity and inflict such despotism. It is the cause of Republicanism to ensure that power remains in the hands of the people.

Last one for now:

I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in "A," "B," "C" and "D." Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism."

This Republican Senator was telling it like it was all the way back in the 60's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From the makers of the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, coming soon to a community near you - the War on Fucking. Bring back the America of dry handjobs and the crippling fear that an unwanted pregnancy will ruin your lives.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Everyone can start doing that weird bed bouncing thing the Mormon kids are doing. That's clearly a loophole that is acceptable by even the most strict nuts

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

bed bouncing thing the Mormon kids are doing

WTF

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure how much truth there is to it, but here goes.

The basic idea is that they've convinced themselves that they can get naked together and insert and it's ok, but actively thrusting makes it a sin. So they will get into position and lay still. A friend then bounces the bed, jostling the participants about, and basically making them have sex but "not by their own actions," which somehow makes it all alright in the eyes of God.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Something something 🎶 fuck me in the ass because I love Jesus 🎶

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's called soaking

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

soaking is just laying on top with Penetration, but not moving, because God's vision is based on movement like a T-Rex. Then you get a friend to bounce on the bed so you're not moving the bed is.aeems like a lot of work for a disappointing 3 some.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean I get it. I get jealous that others have sex lives while I don't.

But trying to exert that jealousy on an entire country's population sounds a little bit extreme

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

If you'd ever slept with a Republican you'd join an anti-sex movement too

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Become?

Here's to pretending they were ever anything but..

Revisionist self delusion is unbecoming.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

...why the fuck do americant's like to go against our very own natural urges?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's a mechanism, but not really an explanation. We could have (and historically have had) a very horny religion rather than one that hates anyone caught getting off.

I'd put the real blame on Patriarchy. Old dudes hate it when young dudes fuck. Incels hate it when anyone else gets laid. Sons are jealous of how much pipe their moms are getting. Straight men are convinced that gay men want their assholes (and secretly jealous of the gay orgy happening next door). Locals are terrified of big dick foreigners running off with their moms, wives, and daughters. And when these are the people that get to make the rules about fucking, its Mutually Assured Destruction for us all.

If you want a sexually progressive society, you need to be like the Bonobo. Put the horniest middle-aged women in charge and let male sexuality be a competition rather than a threat. Then all the grumpy, violent chimps get replaced with fabulous preening peacocks and everyone gets amazingly good at sucking clit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Became? Because they were like that when I was growing up. Their insistence on their right to knowingly give factually incorrect information in sex ed was an early radicalizing moment for me as a teenager in the late 00s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Simultaneously anti-sex and pro-child-pregnancy, of all the stupid shit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Pregnancy as a punishment rather than a goal. The specter of a nine-month-long nightmare existence, where you're bloated and nauseous and in constant physical and emotional pain, only to produce a still birth thanks to your lack of health care. That is just about as anti-sex as you can get.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's because the price of admission is Christianity and marriage. If you don't have those things you don't get to be in the bodily-autonomy cool-kids club.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They don’t get bodily autonomy even then. Try asking them if they think it’s really rape when a husband has sex with his wife when she says no.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Ironically it's probably those who resist sexuality who are the most sexually deviant

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

They want women to be brood sows and maids. Think Handmaids Tale but with less minorities and more rape.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

This is the old school Republican party, it's what's keeping the last of the Reagan Republicans aligned with the MAGAs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Subset of their war on healthcare, which is a subset of their war on humanity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Except for all that kiddy fucking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

owning people still a goal. what civil war?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›