196
What he means is, "I don't want to have to deal with this once I'm President again," and what he does not mean, in any way, is "I give a shit about the situation in Gaza."
I read "finish up" as in "kill them all" not "stop".
Technically that would be "stopping."
Technically not if we're getting into semantics. The English language is always interesting to investigate, and trump is very good at dog whistling using this language.
"finish up" implies to take action quickly to finish the initial goals, such as to attack even stronger and faster to take territory in a short amount of time.
Example: "Finish up your dinner and you can have dessert."
"stop" implies to end immediately with no further action, such as a withdrawal or immediate cease fire.
Example: "Stop the car, I want to get out!"
Not a single time has trump said "stop" the violence in Gaza, not once.
Sounds like he wants Israel to finally solve the Gaza "problem."
A “final solution” if you will.
As proven by his promises to ban gazans from USA
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-vows-expand-travel-ban-gaza-rcna120711
Whereas I urge Trump's cholesterol to "finish up'.
Trump is that fat guy that lost, right?
Don’t forget, he’s also broke!
Fading? Global support is about as visible as God during the holocaust.
That means kill them all
He spent a bunch of time yelling “America first” to his base and telling them that we can’t support, Afghanistan, Ukraine, etc because we need to spend that money at home. And now they’re onboard.
As much as he’d love to paint the democrats increasing pressure on Bibi as “supporting terrorism,” his base prefers the idea of spending that money at home.
his base prefers the idea of spending that money at home.
They clearly don't... otherwise they wouldn't be voting for the person who wants to spend it all on himself.
The like the idea of it. They’re not actually going to get that though.
Yup, Republicans are stuck in a conundrum: they've successfully sold fiscal responsibility and inward focus to their base, but that same base has been sold this idea that there's a chosen people who are entitled to the holy land. Well now they have to choose. I hope they choose the former.
I think there's a good chunk of Republicans who still support Israel at all cost, but I think the realization of what's happening over there is eating away at that steadily. I think America's support for Israel is slowly coming to an end.
Chosen people, are you frickin kidding me? Do you know how much land the Arabs have (Palestinians are mostly Arab)? Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. The Jews ask for one little plot of land and suddenly everybody starts crying genocide. What the hell happened to all the native Berbers in northern Africa?! All because some random guy claimed they were the illegitimate descendents of Abraham ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"The Arabs" are as much one people as "the Europeans", let's just give Italy to the Roma people and demand that Norway take them all in.
The Jews didn't ask. Look, I understand acknowledging conquest and the reality of the world, but to pretend that the conquerors are the good guys while it's happening... Don't be naive. See it for what it is.
Trump, kys.
I don't mind helping
Well he's right about global support.
Trump supporting violence, again.
Why do you think the US economy is doing so good? Arms sales for two wars.
Thats perhaps why ONE small part of the US economy is succeeding. There's A LOT more to the economy than arms.
If Biden stops arms shipments it's over tomorrow.
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
196 points (94.1% liked)
politics
18138 readers
3631 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS