664
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In late December, Swift’s camp hit Jack Sweeney, a junior studying information technology at the University of Central Florida, with a cease-and-desist letter that blamed his automated tracking of her private jet for tipping off stalkers as to her location. In the letter, attorneys from the law firm Venable accused Sweeney of effectively providing “individuals intent on harming her, or with nefarious or violent intentions, a roadmap to carry out their plans.”

Sweeney provided the link to that letter in an email to the Associated Press. In that message, he emphasized that while he has never intended to cause harm, he also believes strongly in the importance of transparency and public information.

“One should reasonably expect that their jet will be tracked, whether or not I’m the one doing it, as it is public information after all,” he wrote.

A spokesperson for Swift echoed the legal complaint, saying that “the timing of stalkers” suggests a connection to Sweeney’s flight-tracking sites. The spokesperson did not respond to questions seeking elaboration of that charge, such as whether stalkers have been seen waiting for Swift at the airport when her plane arrived or, alternatively, if there is evidence that stalkers have somehow inferred Swift’s subsequent location from the arrival time of her flight.

The legal letter likewise accuses Sweeney of “disregarding the personal safety of others”; “willful and repeated harassment of our client”; and “intentional, offensive, and outrageous conduct and consistent violations of our client’s privacy.”

Such statements are difficult to square with the fact that Sweeney’s automated tracking accounts merely repackage public data provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a government agency. That fact did not dissuade the Venable attorneys, who demanded that Sweeney “immediately stop providing information about our client’s location to the public.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 260 points 4 months ago

I thought we went over this already? Public data is public.

[-] Cheradenine 162 points 4 months ago

Yes we did, with elon. He ended up banning the accounts on xitter, after saying he would not do so.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 4 months ago

You can still find it on Mastodon though

https://mastodon.social/@elonjet

[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

I am also a bit lost as to why Swift would bring this suit. Most of her (work) trips are already public information, since being a public person is part of her job description. It’s a bit like the president complaining that we are tracking Airforce 1 when all news networks already report where he is going.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 163 points 4 months ago

Nobody should have a private jet anyway.

[-] [email protected] 145 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Didn't Elon try something similar and lost in court? In case anyone is interested silicon jets tracks billionaires jets.

Edit: I confused silicone and silicon.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 123 points 4 months ago

Interesting how as soon as someone becomes a billionaire they become a dickhead, at least publicly.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

I live under Iraq and this comment made me look up whether she's a billionaire. Guess that's why she's been in the news so much lately. Jesus. I wish the billionaire count was going down, not up.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago

I believe the opposite, you need to have dickhead qualities to become a billionaire

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] [email protected] 102 points 4 months ago

Another point goes to the Streisand Effect.

load more comments (47 replies)
[-] [email protected] 95 points 4 months ago

Well here's a wild idea, why not ride on a normal god damn plane like 90% of every other person who flies. Boom, can't be traced by some kid then AND its better by a wide range for the environment. Nothing to see here but rich people problems lol

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] [email protected] 87 points 4 months ago

Maybe she should buy twitter and ban the guy, or is this the wrong billionaire I am thinking of?

[-] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago

The guy is on Mastodon, tough luck on that one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 86 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I's she also going to sue Ticketmaster and her own PR team for publicly releasing every city she's going to in her tours?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 82 points 4 months ago

Yeeeeah... I understand her not wanting it to be easier for stalkers to track her, but also private jets are a luxury that's very bad for the environment, and the information is public anyway. Swift shouldn't win this one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 79 points 4 months ago

Lol, I love that article. The author clearly also thinks that Taylor and her goons are full of shit on this one. Like, it's public information provided by the FAA. Will they sue the FAA then?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 78 points 4 months ago

Publicly available information from the FAA. Simple as.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 4 months ago

I’m team Florida student.

[-] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago

It sounds tough being a billionaire. She should give it all up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 67 points 4 months ago

She "disregards" everyone's safety by flying in a private jet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The stalker argument is absolute bullshit. A stalker would most likely not use the flight path of Swift's private jet as a means of stalking her; it would be too cumbersome. Additionally, this is not "willful and repeated harassment" of Swift since Mr. Sweeny, as stated in the title and the article, obtained the information from public data provided by FAA. The intent of Mr. Sweeny's tracking project was not to expose Swift to nefarious individuals but to expose the environmental impact of her private jet. The rich and famous are public figures and, as such, are open to criticism from the public. This is merely a flex (and a futile one at that) by someone with the resources to silence critics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago

Hey, Ms Swift...? I love some of your music and political opinions. But can you please go fuck yourself? Public = public. You have more privileges than most working people will ever earn in a lifetime, combined. And the climate emergency WE are all experiencing is irreversible...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago

This is like trying to stop paparazzi... No legal grounds.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago

I bet swift could fly first class and get through the airport without being identified. But the convenience of a private jet is just too sweet.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago

She's concerned for her personal safety, but shouldn't I also be concerned for the risks she brings to me from her excessive co2 production?

[-] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago

Just buy three more jets and send them around all the time you dummie

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago

Well, I had no opinion of her since I don't follow her entertainment. And I did not care about her. I thought sheust be not so bad to have such a following but now she publicly displayed she is as deranged and out of touch as the other billionaires out there. Thus I now have an opinion on her and it's not good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Is this Jack Sweeney's tracker?

https://jackstech.net/planes

Which one is Taylor Swift's plane? Is it "Cosmic Girl?"

He has a much better site right here. It's awesome!!! https://globe.theairtraffic.com/

I'm literally here watching the planes on the map and listening to the noises as they pass by. What's wrong with this at all? It's like just tracking cars and the guy is doing nothing more than just relaying data.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago

Have we ever seen Musk and Swift in the same place at the same time?

[-] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

I'd love for this to go to court, the judge to tell Swift to fuck off, pay the defendants legal fees and a massive fee for a frivolous lawsuit wasting the courts time 🤞

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

Very stupid of her to bring attention to this, because I didn't even know she had a private jet, now more people are aware of Sweeney's website.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PiJiNWiNg 29 points 4 months ago

Excuse my ignorance, but if her legal team decided to sue him into the ground, there's virtually nothing he could do about it, right? There's no recourse to protect "the little guy" from being legally bullied? Would his best bet be to find someone willing to work pro bono with potential to countersue for damages?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago

What a bitch.

I like all the money, attention and being treated like god, but please don’t invade my privacy.

Well you can’t have one without the other, I’m not going to hold my breath for you giving up your fame tho.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago

It's not even an invasion of privacy. The flight info is public.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
664 points (96.2% liked)

News

21706 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS