sanpedropeddler

joined 2 years ago
[–] sanpedropeddler 58 points 6 days ago (22 children)

Gross to me that multiple comments here are ignoring this reality. Crimes committed by men against women in situations like that are so common that women aren't protecting themselves unless they consider every unfamiliar man a potential threat.

Obviously women can also commit crimes against men, but its so much less common that I don't have to take precautions to protect myself against them.

As a man it kind of sucks when you are assumed to be dangerous even when you aren't, but you need to get over it. Its not worth it for women to compromise their safety, and assume you to not be a threat just to make you feel better.

[–] sanpedropeddler 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You mean women are also capable of committing crimes? I'm gonna need some more sources for an outlandish take like that.

[–] sanpedropeddler 1 points 1 week ago

Taiwan is only strategically important to the us because it manufactures those chips. Trump's goal is to increase production in the us, so we aren't forced to intervene when mainland China comes for them.

[–] sanpedropeddler 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've seen boomers complain about a lot of things, but young people's propensity for addiction is not one of them.

[–] sanpedropeddler 44 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I wish it was considered normal for games like this to die out. Trying to maintain your audience with new content every few months is unsustainable. Ideally these games would release with the content the designers intended, no more and no less, and they would slowly lose their less dedicated players.

That way the more dedicated players aren't frustrated by having to keep up with a rapidly changing game, and can just get better in peace. I would guess this wouldn't be profitable for a free to play game with micro-transactions. But, I have a crazy idea. Just charge for the game up front.

[–] sanpedropeddler 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, because Facebook is not explicitly designed for the sole purpose of illegal transactions. Very clear difference.

[–] sanpedropeddler 6 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I think its slightly dishonest to frame this as him simply "creating a website". He created a marketplace to sell drugs on, I just don't understand the sympathy. I feel bad for low level drug dealers in jail, this guy not so much.

I would agree it could've been handled differently, same with every other aspect of the war on drugs. But celebrating this guy is a step too far for me.

[–] sanpedropeddler 8 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck criticism, this man needs to be shot.

[–] sanpedropeddler 5 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

Why are people in support of this guy?

[–] sanpedropeddler 6 points 2 weeks ago

Guys this is a Buddhist symbol. I'm simply supporting America's religious diversity, you bigots.

[–] sanpedropeddler 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't have to have a debate, but using that image as a reaction makes you look like a child. Just respond thoughtfully, or don't respond at all.

[–] sanpedropeddler 28 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Really bro? That's what we're doing now?

 

A lot of the posts here are just pointing out how illogical religion is, which I don't mind. I'm religious myself, but I'm well aware how ridiculous it is. What does bother me is the arguments against Christianity that are used as arguments against all religions. Most of you were likely raised christian, so I understand why you focus on it, but most religions don't have all of the problems Christianity does. I think a lot of the posts here would fit better in an ex-christian community.

5
Watermelon Wonder (sh.itjust.works)
 

25% THC, hybrid, smoked more than I should have and fell asleep watching ghostbusters

6
the spot (sh.itjust.works)
 
19
submitted 2 years ago by sanpedropeddler to c/cats
 
view more: next ›