this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
557 points (94.4% liked)

Memes

1244 readers
24 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Raytheon, I don't think you can greenwash weapon manufacturing.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For every person you kill we plant a tree. It's both good for the environment and a very visible kill count.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could argue that just killing people is statistically good for the planet.

[–] flambonkscious 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if it takes out a plane, that's pretty effective, too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

amazon regrowth speed run

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I don't think that's actually real.

Also a fun fact: Sea Sparrows are some of the missiles used in Ukraine for air defense right now. They're launching then from Soviet land-based anti-aircraft vehicles somehow.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They’re launching then from Soviet land-based anti-aircraft vehicles somehow.

When they do this, it's called a Sea Spaciva. 😏

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thought it was a European sparrow rather than a north American.

Little faster due to a lower unladen weight.

[–] Klear 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting anti-air missiles migrate?

[–] RvTV95XBeo 7 points 1 year ago

All I'm saying is, it's not a matter of fuel efficiency, it's a simple matter of weight ratios. A one ton missile cannot be manufactured and deployed without a comparably sized carbon footprint.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey capitalism, how's it going?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What, does it only target LearJet and Gulfstream private aircraft?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd be okay with that. How do we implement that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can read this in Robert Evans' voice and it's just as sarcastic as anything he's said about them

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ΰ² _ΰ²  wtf did I just read?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do believe it says the sea sparrow is the most environmentally friendly anti-air missile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

For every missile fired we will plant a fucking tree

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, people and airplanes are very bad for the environment.

I wouldn't be surprised if a tactical nuke was a net positive for the environment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

A nuke destroys whole ecosystems...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Chernobyl is doing pretty well now that it's completely uninhabitable by humans...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Plenty of things will survive it, and the removal of the humans in the area may be a net positive.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I'd hate to leave the children we kill a polluted earth behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet it generates a lot of carbon when used though :(

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

But think of the jet emissions reduction it leads to!

[–] Ghyste 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hate that this isn't a meme.

Ed: lolol 300+ mindless upvotes and the poster is the sub mod. Awesome.

Why do communities exist if people are going to dump everything in one place and are rewarded for doing so?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If you're going to be unfriendly to people, the least you can do is be friendly to the ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

ESSM: the Expensive Sea Seeking Missile

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Save the planet (unironically)

Perform UGotFW

took-restraint

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

`Frank, the new CEO had to answer to the board.

The board was getting anxious, and the shareholders were

on a bed, legs in air, ass-cheeks open wide

They were about to get fucked like it was their first time.

When one makes 20 million, ten thousand people lose.

What keeps that one from swallowing a shotgun?

Dan, the company man, felt loyalty to the corp.

After 16 years of service, and a family to support

He actually started to believe

the weaponry and chemicals were for national defense.

'Cause Danny had a mortgage, and a boss to answer to.

The guilty don't feel guilty, they learn not to.

Helen is living in her car, trying to feed her kids.

She got laid off at work, and her house was repossessed.

It's hard to think clearly when it's 38 degrees.

Desperate people have been known to render desperate deeds.

But when she shot that family and moved into their home,

The paper read she suffered from dementia.`

---NOFX - The Irrationality of Rationality

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well weapons are going to be made and used anyway, it's better if they're environmentally friendlier I suppose

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί