[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

i would also be willing to stipulate this

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

or maybe they don’t care so long as it makes them money

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

this is unlikely because they’re incapable of feeling shame

[-] [email protected] 88 points 2 months ago

being a prompt engineer is so much more than typing words. you also have to sometimes delete the words and then type new ones

[-] [email protected] 88 points 3 months ago

back in my day we only had one language. it was called ASSEMBLY. wanted to make the computer do something? you had to ask it yourself. and that worked JUST FINE

[-] [email protected] 88 points 3 months ago

yeah that's a pretty big oversight tbh. they should make the website play "hold" music and add some "timeout" popups you have to keep clicking

206
addition rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
221
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 148 points 8 months ago

poor guy spent so much time on reddit that he forgot women exist

[-] [email protected] 93 points 9 months ago

what if we made a new type of blockchain? one that was powered by generative AI and the metaverse? oh! and could we make it so that it Empowers Business Solutions?

[-] [email protected] 91 points 10 months ago

i’m sure the free market will solve this. we just need to wait for a new company to pop up, make a new operating system, ensure windows programs are properly emulated, convince the majority of people and businesses to use it, and then use its new monopoly for good.

[-] [email protected] 72 points 10 months ago

In a report from The Heritage Foundation back in 2020, the group estimated billions would be saved …

in a better world, it wouldn’t matter what the heritage foundation thinks. they’re a conservative propaganda machine that pushes climate change denial, transphobia, and voter fraud claims. it’s dishonest reporting to cite them without mentioning their track record and credibility.

[-] [email protected] 74 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

very impressive to get that many upvotes on stack overflow with only 4 views

[-] [email protected] 73 points 11 months ago

i thought it would be helpful to make a comment on why the probability after switching is 66%, since it's very counterintuitive. the main reason has to do with why a certain door was chosen to be opened.

in more detail: it helps to instead think about a situation where there are 100 doors, 99 of which have a goat behind them. (original problem was about goats and a car). you choose one of 100 doors. there's a 1% chance you picked the door with the car. in other words, there is a 99% chance the car is behind a door you did not pick. put differently, 99 times out of 100, you are in a situation where the car is behind a door you did not choose.

afterward you pick your door, the host picks 98 doors with goats behind them and opens them. (this is another crucial detail, the host can only open doors that don't have a car behind them.) it is still true that 99% of the time, the car is behind a door you did not choose. this is because the doors were opened after you made your choice. but now, there is only one door you did not choose, so that door has a 99% chance of having a car behind it.

view more: next ›

affiliate

joined 1 year ago