this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
356 points (96.8% liked)

News

23634 readers
2895 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s extreme rhetoric reminiscent of Nazi propaganda and his penchant for siding with America’s adversaries and autocrats pose a unique challenge to his Republican opponents and, ultimately, US voters.

The ex-president, who has a good chance of being the next commander in chief, warned over the weekend that immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of the United States. And he parroted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attempts to discredit American democracy in his latest craven genuflection to the ex-KGB officer, who’s been accused of war crimes.

Trump’s comments on Saturday, at a rally in the first-in-the-nation GOP primary state of New Hampshire, are contrary to America’s founding values and political traditions. They are the latest sign that Trump, who sought to overturn the will of the voters after the 2020 election, would act in an even more extreme fashion in a second White House term. His rhetoric is also likely to play into the central premise of President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign – that he’s the only option to thwart a return to power by an ex-president who could destroy US democracy. It is not yet, however, helping the incumbent in polls that show him trailing Trump in vital swing states.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm getting to the point where I need to start ending relationships with people.

If you're a trump voter after all of this, after january 6th, after all of his treasonous actions, and after this clear step towards hitler, we can't even hold a decent conversation in public, and we certainly can not be friends.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I remember seeing a study that found that conservatives are more likely to have liberal friends, whereas liberals are unlikely to have conservative friends. All the conservatives were circlejerking about “the tolerant left lul”.

But they missed the point; It’s easy for conservatives to tolerate their liberal friends’ views, because they aren’t direct attacks on the conservative as a person. But liberals can’t tolerate conservatives, because they’ll eventually get too comfortable and drop an N-word with a hard R within earshot to see how you react, or casually tell you that you’re “one of the good ones” like it’s some sort of compliment. Liberals just want people to be themselves, but conservatives want to systematically destroy anyone who isn’t like themselves. And that means friendships between conservatives and liberals are not a two-way street, because one wants to fundamentally alter or destroy the others’ entire life.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

My family is that way its why I have cut them off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who are these liberals that conservatives claim to be friends with?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Other conservatives that are socially liberal. They legitimately think everyone left of Bush II was a secret leftist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Liberals just want people to be themselves

Maybe policy-wise but let's not go overboard here. You get A LOT of NIMBYs in liberal affluent neighborhoods when you start talking about low income housing. Or they love brown and black ppl but suddenly start complaining about property values when they start moving into the neighborhood and call the cops because they don't look like they live here.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think I have any actual friends that believe this nonsense, and I purged my Facebook in 2016. The challenge I'm having now is not blowing up my business relationships because, no matter who the president is, I still need to work.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Those aren't relationships, those are necessities of living under a slave-driver.

Lie to them, use them to better yourself, and use that power to undo this evil that has been done.

They do not see you as a person, and will not treat you with any such respect. Nor will they think twice about lying to you or using you to better themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And that's why I poop on company time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even being someone's enemy is a relationship.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I fired a client after he kept going on political rants and sharing his abhorrent views. I don't regret the decision at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Absolutely right. It's goddam tragic a guy like this is getting any Traction. The hell is wrong with us...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I had to "break up" with my best friend over this stuff. His could not let go of his "but both sides" crap. It sucks, but it had to be done. Maybe we'll get back together as friends one day, hopefully

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just read different propaganda than you do, and the real truth is somewhere between Trump's propaganda and what you are reading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LMFAO, "bUt BoTh SiDeS aRe BaD"

Lame as fuck take dude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Better than being a bootlicker for one of the parties. If people could acknowledge fault with their side, maybe we could have honest dialogue and discussion instead of drones shouting unintelligible noise back and forth at each other according to the script from their party.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The simple truth is that even if minorities didn’t exist, and everyone everywhere in the U.S. was the same race and religion and culture, conservatism by its nature has to create an other to differentiate itself and maintain its culture. So then the problem would be you’re not the right kind of Christian or you’re not the right kind of white. This already happened btw with Irish and Italians immigrants in early US history.

[–] TacoThrash3r 5 points 1 year ago

Salem witch trials...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As if people in here aren't "othering" conservatives, severing ties with friends and family and encouraging others to do the same. Creating an other is apolitical, a tool used by Leaders to motivate their base. Landlords, millionaires, cops, managers and so on are favorite "other" groups used by left wing politicians. ACAB, death to landlords, references to guillotines and so on are evidence of this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of the time Paradox of intolerance is just an excuse to be a dick to people you disagree with, all while feeling good and justified about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, it’s possible to use any tool for dickish reasons. But applied at a community or state level, it means that you’re generally selecting for ideologies which are inclusive of the majority of others. It doesn’t mean that anyone who disagrees is outcast or expelled, only that their pov is not translated to law or policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not a very good litmus test to determine right and wrong because tolerance is subjective based on what you feel to be untouchable, inviolable topics. Those could be religion, gender ideology, sexual preference, free speech, right to bear arms, right to own property, right to bodily autonomy, right to associate, and so on, or some combination of these but likely not all of them. It varies with the individual, though most would agree on some of them. The paradox of intolerance should not be expanded to include too much, because it then becomes simply another tool for rhetoric. In the Bill of rights our constitution does a pretty good job describing which topics are off limits, I think.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do the majority not understand that they are also at risk, if less directly

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is making it worse, certainly, but we are already at risk in this shithole country.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For myself and friends who are also members of Team Rainbow, we feel that we are in much more danger than we were in 2015. It feels like if this goes on uninterrupted we will end up with a legal system back where it was illegal to be LGBT. I think that there will be more state level than national level legislation at first, but like with abortion, that’s going to be the ultimate goal.

For women, they’re already there. Republicans have indicated they’re going to be trying to pass national anti-abortion legislation. Again, they start with the states, and each state pushes through slightly different legislation to see what they can get away with. If one gets overturned they pass another with different wording but the same effect.

We live in a safe state, but we (and many of the people we know) have started making plans, like looking into countries with golden visa programs (basically a path to immigration by investment). We’re also looking what it will take to transfer to work for our companies in one of their European offices. If we had been living someplace like Texas (even Austin), we would have moved to the coasts by now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

History is repeating...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Replace 'Trump' with 'Russia'.

They are both entangled in a fight for survival. Both of them need the support of the US people if they have any hope of making it. It's imperative for either party that they win this and nothing is off the table when it comes to politics or influence.

There is an existential war at hand and none of the embattled parties give two shits about the aftermath.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop saying he has a good chance without also saying "if he cheats".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no need to say "if he cheats" because there's no doubt that he will.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He's been sowing doubt for years.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Ah, but how is Biden earning my vote?

Bernie 2016!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is by design.