Imagine if political ads were federally funded with the stipulation that no other funds must be spent on advertising...
Of course, that would be too sane for the U.S.
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19239 readers
1821 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Better: no ads. Give them a website to publish their resume. Make buying airtime illegal.
I don't mind things like flyers. They let me know where local candidates stand and I wouldn't know to go to every website. But endless TV and internet ads are way too far.
A single ballotpedia like website would be my preference, but that raises censorship questions.
Apparently formula does something similar with thier team budgets. In that the League will penalize them for going over. With age of internet it's crazy to spend billions.
It'd be nice, but I genuinely don't see how that could be accomplished without a constitutional amendment. And even then, you have the deeper issue of how to regulate speech that isn't directly associated with the candidate. It's not a big improvement if you have some billionaires just throwing their money around, while a candidate they oppose is legally barred from raising money. I don't see a way to actually implement something like this in a practical way when the stakes are as high as they are. Ultimately, the reason this market is so big is because it truly is that important, and no amount of legislation can really change that. Block traditional TV and radio ads and it'll just shift even more to social media. Block direct campaign social media ads and the money will shift to a bunch of bots and astroturfed viral campaigns, which can't be easily blocked without also blocking individuals' ability to express their politics, which would absolutely, and rightly, violate the First Amendment.
Edit: I'd also just add that the people at large ultimately play a role here as well. If ads didn't work, if we actually formed our views and voting habits based on facts and policies and nothing else, then there wouldn't be a point to ads. But we're fundamentally emotional beings and so here we are.
I can't wait to not see any of it.
There are 257 million voting age adults in the US
I'd rather they just give each of us $60 and be on our way, than endure the onslaught of stupidity and lies
What a waste of money considering more than half these ads will be twisted, borderline slanderous untruths about their political opponents.
It's a waste of money, a waste of time for the viewers, and a downright attack on truth and democracy.
It’s the real reason NH doesn’t want to lose the first primary. All their (remaining) local news and TV is fully funded by political ad money.
Remember when you encounter the dispossessed, disenfranchised or the doomers;
If voting didn't matter; if YOU'RE vote didn't matter, the rich wouldn't spend so much to try and get it.
Excellent point! The numbers don't lie.
Cthulhu 2024: Just end it already
We should be like other countries that limit campaigning to 60-90 days prior to an election.
We won't, but we should.
Thats an awful lot of bribery