this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
208 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19150 readers
1574 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not seeing how it isn’t criminal charges, and instead a settlement with little more then a sorry we got caught.

“I feel like I have to do it otherwise there will be a target on my back in my own district for the chair,”

What a coward.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trying to steal the election should have dire consequences. Not this.

[–] Peppycito 19 points 1 year ago

Losing a civil war shoulda maybe had a consequence or two.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately we don't have a great track record in the USA. The president of the confederacy only got a couple years in prison after the Civil War, and lived as a celebrity for a couple decades after that...

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The big part here is they won't work as electors in any future election where Donald Trump is a candidate on the ballot. Obviously any result they got in the train wouldn't overturn the election but the ruling can help prevent it from happening again.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

I can't understand why they wouldn't be disallowed from working as electors in any future election full stop. Limiting it like that seems like almost no consequence.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is that a deterent? So other MAGA zealots look at that and say "oh, so I can deny democracy in a position of power, and have zero consequences. Hold my beer"

[–] Addition 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like trying to slam a revolving door.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's still not fun for the rest of us watching them try it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In Wisconsin, the Republicans said they met at the state capitol to sign the paperwork so their votes would count if a court ever overturned Biden’s victory in the state. They met about an hour after the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld Biden’s victory in a 4-3 decision that Trump later unsuccessfully appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Just a reminder that Three (3) Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices participated in an attempted coup in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

They got off way too easy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The more I ponder this, the more inadequate it appears to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Nice of them to agree that Biden won now that's almost four years later. Sheesh!! :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh my god! It's 3 years ago! My time machine works!