this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1301 points (99.8% liked)

196

16801 readers
2044 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 145 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

Depending on your definition, this actually is not peak performance.

Subways are.

Obviously, the tunnels are absurdly expensive, but nothing moves as many people as quickly around a city as a subway.

They're also extremely reliable, meaning people are even more likely to actually use them, and their above-ground footprint is essentially zero.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Subways are for mobility (moving large numbers of people rapidly); trams are for access (getting you close to your destination). They complement each other and a well-designed city would have both.

[–] InfiniteStruggle 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

STOP I can only get so erect

You're going to make me write a cute green-urbania fiction of my self-insert walking around a beautiful city with parks everywhere and using the sub-rails to go far distances and then get on cute retro san francisco style over land trams to make my way to walk-only brick roads and then walk to some book store, the corners piled high with books, with books stacked outside the store under a cloth awning, owned by a wise old man of unclear nationality who spends his days reading the books he sells, who knows me well enough to offer a glass of tea.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 50 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I have to disagree. Accessibility of underground transport is abhorrent. Changing from underground to aboveground buses and trains is also shit. The space use of public transport in comparison to car infrastructure is completely negligible. If anything put all the cars underground as they are ugly and stinky. This picture also give you happy chemical because it is green and is not another dead, sealed asphalt hellscape.

[–] reev 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I quite like underground transport, the stations can be absolutely stunning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That might be the higher-than-is-really-safe concentration of fumes doing the stunning...

[–] reev 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

The toxic fumes created by all of those electric trams and subway trains, duh! /s

[–] Klear 6 points 11 months ago

He's making his own.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The London tube is full of soot from the days when they burned coal in there. It's the only subway I've been in where every time I walked out, there would be black tarry shit in my nose.

Also, the brakes for trains throw all kinds of dust into the air in subways

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

wym accessability is abhorrent?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Its literally underground. Anyone that has a wheelchair, old people, blind people etc are not gonna enjoy using it. Elevators are often out of order and even if not its a hurdle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Ramps, escalators, tiles, and seating. There is nothing inherently not accessible about subways, we just choose not to make them accessible. When I was in Japan, there didn't seem to be any issue preventing wheelchair users, old people, or blind people from using the train system. Escalators can be used by people in wheel chairs and old people (and presumably blind people too, but I'm not sure.) There were tactile tiles in the floor to guide the blind, and there was plenty of seating specifically dedicated to old people, disabled people, and pregnant people. There were also wheelchair accessible cars on every train. As far as I could tell, it seemed just as accessible and easy to use for them as anyone else. (Also elevators were only usually kept open for the people who needed them)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Maybe in your city...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You sound like a concern troll. By this logic houses with more than 1 floor are by definition not accessible

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But... They are literally not. My family never had the ability to move to any house they want because everything needs to be accessible on the ground floor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What should I conclude of your personal experience, if it conflicts with what I hear from the disabled people in my life?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe the fact that the disabled people in your life are lucky enough to be able to enough or be in positions where they can still function well?

Fuck, we can't live in a house with proper door thresholds if we want the person in my life to have any semblance of independence.

Please, don't assume your experiences are universal.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

But I like watching things outside the trams.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Skytrains my dude, similar footprint, same tech, and I assume it costs significantly less, and is able to dip underground when there absolutely ISNT the footprint for it above ground

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

While monorails are cool, skytrains are literally just trains and thus insanely hard to beat for cost vs efficiency

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaemo 4 points 11 months ago

The ring came off my pudding can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Would sky trains be as reliable? I assume subways are more reliable partially due to not being exposed to the elements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

At the end of the day, they're still just trains, and while Vancouver's trains DO seem to be somewhat bafflingly effected by severe weather, for the most part things keep running like normal as it still is only somewhat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

If San Francisco informs, light rail streetcars are a gateway to underground subways. It gets the city in the habit of getting on a railcar to go places while the greater infrastructure (the tunnels) are built.

MUNI is mixed undeground and street. BART is over and under and being extended to this day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tunnels also don't take away space from people. This nice looking tramway could be a nice promenade for people instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Without trees. And with asphalt. Basically another asphalt field.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Asphalt field? Your comment makes zero sense.

Have you never seen a promenade with trees, greenery, benches, ... ? You know a place where it's nice for people to spend time instead of space taken up by yet another vehicle?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I guess it depende of definition. For example there is also extra costs with lighting and ventilation for example for subways.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Totally agreed, but the image looks so nice with the grass, subways don't have that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Grass is kind meh. Trees are better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But the grass looks so nice to sit on!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You and grass will burn without trees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] where_am_i 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Living in a big city there's nothing more reliable than a subway. Driving you might always get stuck in traffic. But if you take the Metro your travel time is guaranteed to be as predicted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

True. 45-50 minutes on metro or 35-100 minutes on car.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Completely agree, however I think this is decent intermediary between the larger investment into subways, especially depending on geology

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Also if you really want you can put trams underground.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The problem is moving people to tunnels

load more comments (1 replies)