I was referring to the many instances in which the blastocyst does implant, but fails to grow past the initial stages of development. Progression to the point of differentiation of tissues is the hurdle that many fertilized ova fail to clear. Failure of implantation is still important to discuss in the political context given that there are so many people with an absolute absence of biology education that think that life begins at fertilization.
They want to go back to the days where life expectancy for women is to the "ripe old-age of died in childbirth".
The proportion of pregnancies that end in miscarriage is MUCH higher than that. Many "pregnancies" (read: fertilized ova) don't implant in the uterus or implant and fail to progress which ends up looking like a heavy period that's a little late. Judging the start of "life" as fertilization is absolutely inane because of how many fertilized ova just don't make it past 16 cells or so.
I was about to comment a similar sentiment. I didn't realize I stopped existing or had my gender identity reassigned because I'm on lemmy instead of other social media.
I didn't originally set out to go to a DO school, but I do like the approach that they teach us which is to treat the patient as a whole person. Someone's psychological health can be suffering because of poor physical health and visa versa, so it's important to work on both, and to make sure that the treatments being discussed are actually feasible and reasonable for them to try to adhere to. (i.e. telling someone to "just lose weight" without working with them on strategies on how to do so in a safe and manageable way is just plain stupid.)
Agreed. It's always more complicated than "just psychological". There can be a psychological element to it because things like emotional stress can have downstream effects by way of over-activation of the sympathetic nervous system, but it's not a be-all-end-all explanation. The mind is powerful and can exert influence over the rest of the body, but that just means that you have to treat the psychological portion as well as the somatic portion.
At this point, Israel is a rogue terrorist state that needs to be cut off from all material and financial support until they agree to permanent ceasefires and handing Netanyahu and his cabinet over to the ICC.
He was banned from trying to join any branch of the military because he did so poorly on the ASVAB (and probably also failed a psych eval). While many police departments are deeply corrupt, I don't think any of them want the bad press that would come with hiring him. Maybe he can get hired as a deputy in a sheriff's department run by someone like Arpaio.
"Assault" is shouting and threatening, "battery" is actually making contact. It sounds like she got the pepper spray out in time to prevent him from touching her, which is a very good thing.
Usually the situation they put themselves in is taking a job as a cop and refusing to deescalate any situation.
I'm pretty sure I've gotten a couple board questions wrong because I leave stuff like conversion disorder/functional neurological disorder so far down my differential that it's basically in the trash anyways. I see it as a diagnosis of extreme exclusion.
The immune mediation would explain why AIDS medications might work though, particularly if it's one of the viral synthesis inhibitors.
view more: next ›
The issue comes from the fact that if there's any amount of implantation and the very earliest stages of development, a pregnancy test will come back positive and there are many diagnostic tests (most imaging modalities) and many procedures (such as non-obstetrical emergency surgeries) that will get delayed or sometimes even denied because of the positive pregnancy test. Every AFAB that comes through an ER that might need imaging gets a point-of-care pregnancy test that has to come back negative for something like a CT scan unless it is a very dire situation because of the radiation risk to a developing embryo.
Obstetrical procedures like abortions are not the only ones that are gate-kept for AFAB patients because of the policies surrounding risks to developing embryos or fetuses.
Edit to add: The studies do say that the estimated incidence of clinically unrecognized pregnancies is approximately 20%, but given the myriad risk factors that can feed into that outcome, things like exposures, stresses, SES, and access to medical care may increase that incidence rate in some populations.