this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
93 points (93.5% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2280 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

BEIJING (Reuters) - Many Chinese are venting their frustration at the slowing economy and the weak stock market in an unconventional place: the social media account of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing.

A post on Friday on protecting wild giraffes by the U.S. embassy on Weibo, a Chinese platform similar to X, has attracted 130,000 comments and 15,000 reposts as of Sunday, many of them unrelated to wildlife conservation.

"Could you spare us some missiles to bomb away the Shanghai Stock Exchange?" one user wrote in an repost of the article.

The Weibo account of the U.S. embassy in China "has become the Wailing Wall of Chinese retail equity investors", another user wrote.

The U.S. embassy did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 9 months ago (3 children)

China built an economy that's like 50% based on bullshitting to your superiors about how much infrastructure you built.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They also overbuilt infrastructure and entire housing complexes sit empty. So is it both?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Housing which is shit and often unsuitable for habitation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tofu-dreg_project

And to be clear, they've built a lot of infrastructure, but it's often underbuilt. Eg. they'll build huge projects or even residential districts, but save money by not ensuring there's sufficient drainage. Result: fancy stadium, looks better than many a western stadium, cost less to build, fancier, looks higher quality, what you see may even be better quality, built in record time, but when it rains everyone's walking in poo water.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Southern and central China are drowning. Since June 18, the regions have suffered their worst bout of flooding in a decade, furthered by a category 4 typhoon that hit the mainland after sweeping through Taiwan Friday morning, local time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago
[–] pelespirit 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Your article is for Taiwan and they had a typhoon come through. Do you have anything for mainland China?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

furthered by a category 4 typhoon that hit the mainland after sweeping through Taiwan

That article is about mainland China. It just says that the typhoon hit Taiwan first. However it is still about a typhoon, and while infrastructure should be built to handle the worst storms that come through it's definitely less shocking when it fails to that than to regular rain

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Both articles that parent post linked to are about mainland China.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At a micro level, theres a lot of low quality products. Things that look okay on their face, but fall apart with any minor inspection.

I wonder if that's deep down the problem for China, beyond products.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It's what happens when you build a culture around "saving face" rather than competence. And then kill 10% of the population, targeting the productive and educated.