this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
564 points (93.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27147 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Based on the evidence I've seen, women do tend to bear more of the cognitive load of running a household in our society. Can you share any evidence that says otherwise? I'd love to learn.

I haven't done that much research, but a quick Google scholar search suggests that it's a pretty gendered issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's cool but has nothing to do with this, so unfortunately I don't have any studies prepared for you to learn from.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
  1. We've established that the task of maintaining on a household typically falls on women in our society.
  2. We have an example here of a sticker chart being used to encourage a man to take care of his child.
  3. You're saying I'm biased for thinking that the man needs this chart.

Nah, bruh, I'm just looking at the data and drawing conclusions.

Sure, there are exceptions, but when we lack any other indicators of exceptions, it's safe to assume societal roles carry over. Making any other assumption is ironically letting YOUR personal biases show.

If I tell you 7/10 balls in a box are red, 3/10 are blue, and ask you to guess the color of a ball I'm grabbing from the box, what're you going to guess? Red.

I'm pretty sure this sticker chart is fake anyways, but it's the reaction of folks to this that's surprising.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No you're dishonestly ignoring all the content of the image and pushing some random stats in a vacuum.

I could care less about those stats, I have eyes.

Obviously this is fake, but it's fun to argue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

What am I ignoring?

I could care less about those stats, I have eyes.

Okay if we're just going to pick and choose what context we ignore when interpreting what we see then there's no real point in having a conversation.