this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
33 points (61.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36167 readers
1011 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

like i’m watching blue planet and i’m yelling at the tv!

there’s all these yimmer yammer hand-wavey scientific rigor lines where it’s like ‘we may believe that these animals do on occasion have a base brain-related impulse that allows them to experience feelings somewhat like to those of friendship’ or whatever in the script on top of footage that they then describe as ‘it seems as though these two groups [of fish, different species] are old friends…’ in an almost whimsical manner.

can’t they give them some credit! they have eyes and a face, why is it so insane to think they can’t experience friendship or love or joy just like us? ‘buhhu uhhh its only accurate science if we only observe observable behavior’ why?? you’re neglecting a whole part of any living thing’s experience! inner life can’t be hand waved away! even for a mollusk!

and people loved doing this on reddit as well -- oh actually your cat doesn't understand love or joy or humor, it is simply reacting to the physical warmth of your lap, they don't actually care for you. don't worry, depth and emotion does not exist!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There are plants that can get "scared" and warn other plants of danger. Even plants that can uproot themselves and move if they feel threatened. They don't even have nervous systems or muscles in any way that we understand and are capable of locomotion, sensing their surroundings and communication.

Even plants may have feelings.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My phone warns me that the battery is low, does that mean that it has feelings and doesn't want to die?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It may. Can you prove it either way?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They aren't warning other plants of danger. That's an anthropomorphic interpretation.

They are releasing a chemical. Other plants respond to that chemical in a predictable, biological way.

There is no motive. No intent to save or protect. It's not a warning. It's just an evolutionarily advantageous sequence of cause and effect.

Just because object A's behavior helps object B's survival doesn't mean it has feelings. Complex cause and effect can be emergent phenomena without specific intent

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I don't think plants or certain animals actually experience life similarly, aren't our own emotions basically a product of chemicals being released in our brain as a result of certain stimuli?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Emotions" is a very nebulous term. But we know that abstractions like guilt require certain types of brain function that is only found in humans, dolphins, etc

So yes, human emotion is indeed a sufficiently complex series of cause and effect. But that complexity is really important. And certain structures in the brain are necessary for things like self-awareness, abstraction, empathy, etc

For the record I believe that dolphins are non-human-persons. So I'm not a "humans are completely unique" kind of guy. But I also don't anthropomorphize lower order animals :D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feelings in the sense of "they feel things through a sensory organ and react to that", same as sight, hearing, touch? Sure!

Feelings like fear? No.

Aversion from pain is not the same as fear, fear is aversion from pain that hasn't happened yet, it requires the ability to abstract the concept of negative outcomes and expand the aversion from discomfort to possible discomfort.

No plant has been observed reacting to something that it hasn't experienced at least once before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your bias is showing. The fact that we have not observed something is not evidence that it doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, have you accepted the lord Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Black holes were thought to be only theoretical until we fucking observed one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Theoretical is not the same as "made the fuck up"

Something being theoretical is as good as it gets short of being observed in science, it means the most evidence points to it being real which is why we spent insane amounts of money to find evidence of it.

If you were to postulate black holes without evidence they would exist but they would still made the fuck up until proven otherwise, not "theoretical".

Again, have you accepted the lord Jesus Christ?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I give him the same level of acceptance as Allah, Vishnu, Odin, and the Flying Spaghetti Monster. There's a nonzero possibility that they're real, after all. I try to keep an open mind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, I give a sentient mollusk the same credence, i.e. a token amount that does not change my behaviour at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right, because that token credence is completely in line with your previous assertive dismissal of your earlier comments. How very open minded.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it is in line.

Are you not sinning for fear of retribution? Would you give pause to your actions only cause I called them sinful, or would you dismiss my accusations and go on with your day?

I'm dismissive because that's what "token" credence gets you. Yeah, it may be possible, but we all know it's about as likely as the sky falling tomorrow, so I'm not about to waste my time entertaining the possibility.