this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
172 points (89.4% liked)

Videos

14053 readers
255 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don't be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I did not watch this video but did read about this math. Visualize the larger circle unwrapped into a flat line, and the smaller circle sliding along the length of the line so its bottom point is fixed to the line. You'll see the small circle never rotates. Now slide the small circle with a point fixed onto the large circle in the same way, and you'll see the small circle makes one complete rotation. That rotation happens in addition to the rotations you get from dividing the larger circumference by the smaller circumference, so the answer is 4 in this case

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Satellite operators have to use this equation for orbits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (4 children)

if the path had been straight yeah, but the path itself rotates 360 degrees, which gives us an extra rotation

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

This is the comment that finally enlightened me

[–] ThrowawayPermanente 2 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This finally made it click. Thanks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Now that is mind-bending trickery! Having a degree in applied matha millennia ago did not help...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's what you'd think, but there's an extra rotation involved in the act of the small circle moving around the larger circle rather than along a straight line, so it's (6π/2π) + 1

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I just watched the video, that's really interesting. Thanks for the explanation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Watch the video, it's explained.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This should have been an article. What's the summary?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I summarized it above, there's an extra rotation included when the outer circle moves along the inner circle, essentially falling a bit with every roll forward. If the outer circle rolled along a straight line of the same length as the circumference of the inner circle, it would only roll 3 times, but moving around the circle instead adds exactly one extra rotation. That other gent says this is used in calculating orbits too, where you're also moving forward while constantly falling

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I read an article about it. Everybody is doing a shit job of describing what happens. The outer circle naturally makes a full rotation as it travels around the inner one, as the path it follows goes around a full 360°, so that counts as one of the rotations it ends up making, which is in addition to the 3 due to travel around the circumference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

thank you, that was the comment that explained it for me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Thanks for letting me know! It was too frustrating to not share.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Add the radius together. If the circle is inside. B-A 3-1 = 2.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It’s in the video.

A circle with a radius of 2 and a circle with a radius of 3 would be 5 rotations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

First you said add the radii together, then you gave an example subtracting them, but either way this is incorrect. You divide the larger radius by the smaller radius and add 1

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not quite. With radius 2 and 3 circles, the outer circle would take 2.5 rotations to complete the revolution. You have to set the first circle radius to 1 (divide both radii by the lesser) and then add the radii to calculate the relative circumference of the circle drawn by the motion of the center of the outer circle, so the answer would be calculated like:

2/2 + 3/2 = 5/2 = 2.5

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The center travels 2π per rotation but need to travel 8π because the path of the center of the small circle is a circle 4r the radius of the large circle plus the radius of the small circle. It would be three if the center of the small circle traveled along the edge of the larger circle but it's edge to edge.