vrighter

i hate coding for browsers. To that end, I do not actually know css. I just called it padding when I wrote my own qr code library, because it was easier to say than "quiet zone".

Just like "dots" or "pixels" are easier to say than "modules"

playing nintendo games, on a pc, using a dualshock feels so wrong and yet so right

the bottom one is not a qr code. The padding is part of it.

anyone remember the anarchist's cookbook?

tests are code too. It makes you feel more productive to generate them, I guess.

If it's not good for the real code, it's not good for the tests

it's "my way or the highway" but for gui

i wish the phrase "maybe later" would be forced to be changed to "no". The word no has disappeared!

randomly doesn't mean equiprobable. If you're sampling a probability distribution, it's random. Temperature 0 is never used, otherwise a lot of stuff would consistently hallucinate the exact same thing

they can't if they distribute the mod as a patch, "for educational purposes"

The patch does not contain anything proprietary.

if it's allowed to use its own interactions as data, it will collapse. This has been studied. Stuff just does not work the way you think it does. Try coding one yourself.

The llm does not give you the next token. It gives you a probability distribution of what the next token coould be. Then, after the llm, that probability distribution is randomly sampled.

You could add billions of attention heads, it will still have an element of randomness in the end. Copilot or any other llm (past, present or future) do have this problem too. They all "hallucinate" (have a random element in choosing the next token)