173
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

PECULIAR, Mo. (KCTV/CNN/CNN Newsource/WKRC) - An elderly man is facing homelessness after Social Security ordered him to repay over $60,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 79 points 7 months ago

Apparently this isn’t uncommon. There should be a statute of limitations on how long they can request repayment back for their mistake, 6 mo max or something like that. That way you aren’t having to pay back decades of their fault.

[-] [email protected] 70 points 7 months ago

I would argue that if the government makes a mistake then it is on them to own the problem, not the citizens. I might make an exception for a partially large mistake, but presumably most people would report if they suddenly received a million dollars in their social security check so I doubt it would be that big of an issue. Any smaller mistakes should be a write off.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

I see a million pop up on me in social security I'm moving it to another bank, converting it to crypto hopping a plane to Ghana or some shit, buying up like $850,000 in silver, and enjoying the rest of my life.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Banks make mistakes and this is generally how it works. Most people will not give 1M back. Statues make it fair.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

That is most certainly not how it works. If a bank accidentally gives you a million dollars it's best to inform them and give it back in whatever process they determine. They will not just write it off. They will figure it out eventually.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Rando gets an extra zero is one thing. Getting disability is nearly impossible. I wasted years trying, they gave me a lump sum and then denied the ongoing claim. I've spent 80% of every day in bed for 10 years. When my folks die, I will buy a bullet with whatever is left in the bank. Disability doesn't pay close to minimum wage and no one is living off of minimum wage. Anything given to people in this circumstance should be written off. Anyone in my situation should be buying a second bullet for the assholes coming after people like this. I was just riding a bicycle to work when I got hit. I rode to help save money for my daughter. Providing less than it takes to survive in a country with over 750 criminal billionaires is just as bad as the Nazis sending the disabled to gas chambers. The misery is just strewn out longer in one case.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Right. That’s what I’m saying.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Ahh sorry, I misunderstood you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Ehhhhhh. Their loss.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This happened to my mom while she was terminally dying in a nursing home paralyzed in a wheelchair, yep the government just stopped giving her social security benefits and started garnishing everything. "oH SoRRy wE oVeRpAiD yOu, wE'rE tAkiNg iT aLL bAcK nOw." She lived like 10 more years after that. absolute hell.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

No, no repayment, if someone errors in your favor, they are at fault, not you. They must bear that repayment burden

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

While that would be ideal it’s also unrealistic. Banks don’t even operate that way because people make mistakes. A statute of limitations is fair to all.

[-] andrew_bidlaw 3 points 7 months ago

It should be gradual decided by the sum of payments: if you own more, you have a longer term.

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
173 points (98.3% liked)

News

21741 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS