this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
471 points (94.9% liked)

News

27004 readers
5124 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Honestly disgusting how the media overlooks this. No idea what these children have ever done. Irrespective of what side you support this is genocide and this should not be tolerated.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"noooo these children voted for Hamas they deserve every bit of suffering they get"

Fucking assholes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

These children can’t have voted for hamas. The last election in Palestine was in 2006.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Well I'm sure they would if we would let them not starve until the next one. Ben and his psychotic entourage, probably.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They will see all of this and serve as warriors in the next generation of hatred. Just like the other side too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And I wonder how many of those who voted for them in 2006 are still alive...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Crazy how people acc think like this

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Children didn't vote for the Nazis in the 1930s either but they still died when we bombed German cities. Children die in wars, it's an unfortunate fact, and Hamas just declared war on their neighbours.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Israeli children die: "bomb all of Gaza, kill as many kids as needed until Hamas is over"

Palestinian children die: "it's just war, mate, what can I say? War sucks :("

Screw this crap.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a huge difference between an official declaration of war and warning civilians and sneaking in in early morning and killing them in their beds isn't there?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but from where I am looking, whenever a civilian is killed, it's a tragedy.

And that includes Israel as much as Hamas.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately we don't live in an ideal world and we have to weigh things up sometimes that aren't pleasent.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

So Israel can win because it's stronger. In a nutshell.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was the top story on NPR's up first podcast today. They didn't exactly blame Isreal directly, but they also didnt defend Israel and suggest this is somehow justified. They stuck pretty close to here is what is happening on the ground, here's voices of those affected, this is a humanitarian tragedy and will only get worse. They mentioned a woman in Gaza rationing milk for her baby due to the food shortage, that stuck with me. So I guess #notallmedia.

The coverage on the NYT The Daily podcast was spot on what I would expect from the outlet that cheared us into invading Iraq. Trash podcast, I don't know why I'm still subscribed. Should have dumped it after they spent a whole episode making a martyr out of the praying football coach.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NPR's coverage has been very good so far. They are trying their best to remain impartial in a difficult situation where there is a humanitarian crisis. I think it's the right thing to do. The media doesn't need to point fingers at Israel when they can just report the facts and people can see where the blame lies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'll second this. Every time they mention the Israeli casualty toll, they mention the Palestinian right at the same time.

While interviewing someone about Israeli response, they took the time to raise the question about plans for Palestinian civilians (unfortunately the answer was "we must destroy Hamas", clearly indicating the civilians dying is perfectly fine by him).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The media does everything they can but tell the truth because it flies counter to the goals of capitalism.

[–] Peaty 5 points 1 year ago

Was Pravda ever telling the truth?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imma save this comment as an example of the word "capitalism" being used as a weird boogeyman by lemmies, such a joke lmao

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capital loves Israel, especially the military industrial complex.

Sure, maybe it's not a very direct link, but it's part of what the people in power want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Capital loves Israel

What

maybe it’s not a very direct link

Yeah no it's not

[–] Gorilladrums 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think anybody actively supports the killing of children, however, Israel can't respond to the terrorist attacks without attacking Hamas. Hamas is well known for hiding weapons, militants, and supplies among the civilian population (whether they like it or not), the casualties on the Palestinian side was always expected to be high because of this. It was also expected that no matter how mildly or aggressively Israel responds, there will always be people who try to paint Hamas terrorists as the good guys (including justifying the terrorist attacks) and Israel as the bad guy.

There's still a very big difference here. Hamas is killing civilians because they were the target. The intention was to commit massacres because their goal is genocide. Israel is killing civilian by accident because Hamas militants purposely endanger civilians to either protect themselves or increase the number of casualties. The intention here is to kill terrorists and the goal is wipe out Hamas. While killing civilians in either case is wrong as a matter of principle, the former is worse based on intentions alone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just want to say that any attacks on civilians, whether it be Hamas or the IDF, I don’t justify. While I agree that war inevitably brings about the deaths of civilians, Israel hasn’t exactly made it seem as if striking Gaza is purely to target Hamas. They’ve made their intentions on flattening the whole of Gaza clear and I’m not quite sure how cutting the water supply for 2million people could be a non-intentional act towards the whole population rather than opposed to only Hamas.