this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
217 points (92.5% liked)

news

23512 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views," Jean-Pierre said. "There is no 'yes or no' answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we're going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that."

"Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this," New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It's a disgrace."

"Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare," Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. "He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia."

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer "A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that" funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that "centrist" nonsense. There's nothing complicated about it, and it's not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people's emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they'd start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it's as good a time as ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, democrats have demonstrated repeatedly that they are unwilling to do anything. you would be a fool to vote for them over and over again after seeing their incompetence and unwillingness to even slightly push back against the reactionary policies being enacted under biden

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The Democratic Party has room for improvement, sure, but it's also the only party with room for improvement. On this issue, not voting is the same as voting for a Republican. That surely won't get you any improvement.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

The Democratic Party has room for improvement

Yes and this it the room barbara-pit

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, not voting is just not voting. voting for the republican party is voting for the republican party. and from where im standing, the difference between dems and republicans is negligible. the dems arent offering any “improvement”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Republicans are salivating over the prospect of you not voting. Exactly what they want.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

further exploiting and oppressing the working class is exactly what the republicans want. and the dems are united w them in that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Thise two parties are nothing alike.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Both support US imperialism, both support killing homeless people, both support exploiting workers, both support and uphold slave owners (our great founders)/American history which inspired Nazism, and clearly neither genuinely support LGBTQ people.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1912/nov/09.htm

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

You're right

Conservatives stab you in the face

Liberals slip it into your spine

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

how are they different when theyre both capitalist neoliberal warmongers

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Screw the Poor and Old

Hey now, they screw the young too

didnt-kill-himself

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who broke the rail strike? Who bombed the Balkans?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Except for the acknowledged bipartisan policy consensus

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

there's a famous line that the US is a one party state but in typical American extravagance, we have two of them. both parties serve capital. you are not the core demographic of either party. they can and will fuck you over if it makes their benefactors a quick buck. the Republicans move the political needle rightwards and the Democrats act as a ratchet to prevent any kind of real left politics in this country. both parties must be destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

the dems are salivating over the prospect of useful idiots like you voting for them election after election after decades of failing to deliver on any of their promises because "it's complicated." Exactly what they want.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The dems also. The less voters they less they have to spend on marketing. Imagine if they proposed one popular thing. They would have the election in the bag. That is all it would take, one broadly popular position. They are so opposed to democracy that people generally being in favor of a thing is not reason enough for them to enact a policy. They would rather spend donation money proping up GOP candidates than legalizing weed nationally or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

The Democratic party doubled Trump's deportation numbers, gave the police record funding and has now ceded trans rights to the right

There is no room for improvement and no point in voting in national elections, we warned you motherfuckers but you didn't listen, now eat shit dem

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Actually since the democrats are republicans, by not voting for democrats I'm voting for democratsthink-about-it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hear the same thing from both parties, therefore not-voting must be the same as voting for both parties, which counts as voter fraud.