robinn2

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I agree, face the wall

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

All these people saying we should just pay workers more, they don't realise it's part of a conveyor belt, if you start paying people more they'll start expecting more pay every time work increases or you need them to work longer hours or travel further for their job.

Si

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They're the type of socialism (social democracy) that I approve of.

Social democracy is not socialism, it is social-fascism, class collaboration leeching off the wealth of the global south like a settler vampire from the hill of the imperialism. Look at how social democratic settlers treat immigrants, or minorities/natives. You fundamentally do not understand what socialism is.

And no offense, but you have no fucking idea what the the PRC is doing. You know nothing about their government structure, how policy is carried out, or the way the system functions at all. I guarantee you could not name the tiers of government, or even three government officials without looking it up. Your ignorance is shown right away by the fact that you say “CCP” (Chinese Communist Party) when the correct acronym is “CPC” (Communist Party of China). This is such a simple mistake that proves you have not read any media outside of the west regarding China.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Then you have some racist elements mixed in with the student protests I've heard, i.e. that there were some Chinese who were protesting because they didn't like the presence of African exchange students at their universities. I don't know how true that is, but I've heard it a few times

From Another View of Tiananmen:

Concerns over prices weren’t solely due to absolute levels of privation, however. The complaints were heavily tinged with elitism. Students and urbanites were not happy to see peasants and farmers do so well relative to them. This “economic anxiety” had manifested itself a year earlier in Nanjing, where students affected by cuts to tuition subsidies took out their anger on African exchange students. “From December 1988 to January 1989, students in Nanjing, China waged violent protests against visiting African students.” The writing on the placards was very revealing:

Like most foreign students, the Africans enjoyed greater standards of living in China and some dated local women. Among the signs in the crowd at Hehai on Christmas Eve 1988 were placards demanding greater democracy alongside ones proclaiming, “death to the black devils”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shut up racist

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Nazi instance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Shut up racist

16
Seethe (hexbear.net)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

These are from the creator/moderator of the racist China sub lmao (@[email protected]). They also pretended not to read my post so they didn’t have to defend their bs, but they absolutely did read it, because they changed “CPP” to “CCP” in the sidebar afterwards. And yet they continue to use the “it originated in China” excuse despite this being refuted.

So that was a lie

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

No that’s uh because uh

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

We cannot be blocked, we are the tide of history

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Says something incorrect Gets well cited rebuttal "Omg I won cuz I made you mad"

see above

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Person who thinks they can refute video evidence, the admissions of student leaders and a western correspondent, and the private admissions of the US government.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Shut the fuck up, you’re literally the only other person who posts on here, I’m not exposing you in a 2 month old thread. Your racism will be on the front page.

 

"We were founded on an idea, but sometimes we fail to live up to it" if I hear this one more time I will personally [removed call to violence].

0
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The clips at the beginning made me so mad, not just because they're incorrect but because people from the U.S. who support the U.S. (and U.S. officials) are making them. How many coups has the U.S. supported in Africa? How many oppressive pro-Western movements and governments have they propped up in Africa? Now they care about Africa, now they're so worried China might be exploiting them. Fuck off. Oh and it's hilarious when France makes these claims for obvious reasons, but what's notable is that the U.S. and their mouthpieces don't hound France for these reasons, aren't nearly as concerned about what France does, or the IMF even.

 

"Not really fair to nazis (cites BBOC)" jesus christ and that's still up while the person who said nazis/sympathizers should be shot has their comment removed. Scratched liberals show where their preference is in "both are bad" the second is the USSR is defended.

 
 

“We won’t be their negroes. Providence never designed us for negroes, I know, for if it had it wou’d have given us black hides, and thick lips, and flat noses, and short woolly hair, which it han’t done, and therefore never intended us for slaves. This I know is good a sillogissim as any at colledge, I say we are as handsome as old England folks, and so should be as free” -- John Adams under a pseudonym

Also read Domenico Losurdo's Towards a Critique of the Category of Totalitarianism, section: “Racial state and eugenics: the United States and the Third Reich” [link]

Death to Amerika, death to liberalism

 

Thx

 

Major introductory text and thesis regarding SWCC and the reform and modernization policies. [Beijing Review 30:45 (pp. 13-42)]

Please leave questions in the comments! ≧◉ᴥ◉≦

view more: next ›