this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1263 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
379 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You have a very privileged job if you're just allowed to just tell your employer no when they want more work out of you...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If my workload means I consistently have to put in more than 8 hours a day, it's my responsibility to report that. I have a contract for 40 hours a week, I'm not a slave.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You can report whatever you want. There's no assurance your employer will give a shit. The subject of this conversation was likely not on a 40 hour contract.

[–] prole 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... Yes there is? The law?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't know what country you live in but not in the US.

[–] prole 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So do you believe contracts in the US are unenforceable, or...?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I believe 99% of Americans don't HAVE employment contracts, and further that this kind of clause would be impossible to enforce because you'd have to somehow prove that 40 hours was not enough time to do your work, which is impossible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe this is the socialist European in me, but I can't believe that. Without a contract, the employer isn't obligated to pay you at all and you're not obligated to work. Even if it's just sealed with a handshake, there is a legal framework for both parties. If you just treat it all like an EULA and say whatever, just let me work for you and it'll work out, then that's your problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe this is the socialist European in me, but I can't believe that.

I dunno what to tell you bud but it's 1000% true. I've had a dozen jobs and never had a contract.

Without a contract, the employer isn't obligated to pay you

Yes, they are.

Even if it's just sealed with a handshake, there is a legal framework for both parties.

Handshakes are not legally binding, nor are verbal contracts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Employment contracts in the US are quite rare. 49 out of 50 state are at-will employment (Montana being the exception), so they can fire you for any or no reason, excluding a small list of illegal reasons.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then I'll start looking for another job... What kind of absolute dead end jobs are you guys working, that you have to be completely spineless? No wonder that conditions are getting worse and worse.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Lots of people have shitty jobs with shitty employers. That's just the way the world is. Not everyone gets to pick from their lot of potential employers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of folks here haven't actually entered the real world yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is your duty to at least state how much work you already have and let the boss decide what to do.

I had a boss who acknowledged it and told me that it's fine if i'm not too accurate for couple of things.

Not saying anything, burning out and just delivering shit work non-stop isn't going to help either you or the employee, your job is to do your best and your boss has to figure out the rest.

Although i have to say i quit that job, because doing half-assed work is nothing which fulfills me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes you think she didn't do that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say she didn't do any of that, considering her story, it wasn't just the workload, nothing to gain from an environment this toxic. If you have any legal grounds to stand on, use it.

I think it's kinda weird there is not one proof of it happening yet, not a recording or anyone talking for or against it, we'll see how things turn out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not weird at all. If true, it would be unsurprising if they were hiding any documentation of it.

I expect, if true, there will be more whistleblowers shortly.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 0 points 1 year ago

Idk, that's a very core part of our company's culture.

I'm a SWE at a manufacturing company, so I'm certainly in a privileged group. However, the whole company has been pushing the narrative of empowering individuals to say no (i.e. the andon cord at Toyota). And given how frequently it's brought up in company emails (esp. in incident analysis communications), I have reason to believe it's actually being done at the plants. Our company's #1 stated priority is safety (due to the nature of the products we produce), and saying "no" is a huge part of that. We as SWEs have complete power to say "no" (we make our own estimations for work), and I believe our manufacturing workers have a similar ability to manage their workload.