this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
481 points (95.3% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
408 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tellah 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Meanwhile cannabis beverages are required to have:

-Nutrition facts including calories, sugar, etc.

-Gigantic yellow warning with random health warning (e.g., don't use if pregnant)

-Huge red stop sign cannabis leaf logo

-KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN

-Big pain in the ass plastic childproof thing

None of these required on a can of beer.

From a harm reduction perspective, it's a massive failure. Many cannabis beverages have very low nearly zero calories, sugar-free. For your physical health they are almost certainly less harmful than alcohol and I know many people would enjoy them as an alternative to alcohol.

We have faced a similar failure in harm reduction strategy regarding vaping versus tobacco. I think in both cases it's a result of vested interests (tax revenue, lobbying, don't know) trumping what is best for people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The way Canada has handled cannabis legalization is embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're still ahead of the people who haven't legalised it or even criminalise it, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s not something to be proud of. Just because someone does it worse doesn’t mean you should be proud of how it’s done.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'm not saying we should rest on our laurels.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To who? Because we're still the only country with it fully legalized for recreational use. I fail to see how that's embarrassing at all.

We used to have weird rules on alcohol too, and just like those, cannabis rules have been getting better as time has gone on. You can't expect a world first system to be perfect right out of the gate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems good to me. If people want it they can get it now.

[–] can 1 points 1 year ago

That was always true though. The difference now is consistency

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah federally across the whole country? Sounds terrible.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you simplify anything that much it seems like a great idea. You obviously don’t know much about the Cannabis Act.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Oooooobviously

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when you have a large segment of the population that is both opposed to something, and not terribly against acting in bad faith. You get poison pills in your regulations.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

To me the worst part is allowing at parks, so now myself or young kids have to experience the stench of some asshat not caring about fellow citizens and they recreation time.