this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
159 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22958 readers
3575 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Over 300 international students have had their visas suddenly revoked by the Trump administration amid a major escalation in the crackdown on student activism in the United States. What began as a targeted attack against some of the most vocal pro-Palestine students, starting with the arrest of Columbia University student activist Mahmoud Khalil, has now escalated into a broader attack against international students in general.

Students across the country at a variety of both public and private institutions including but not at all limited to Harvard University, the University of Tennessee, the University of Minnesota, the University of Texas at Austin, and throughout the University of California system.

A lawsuit filed on April 5 by a California college student suing DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons claims that these visa revocations are “primarily targeting” students of African, Arab, Middle Eastern, Muslim, and Asian origin. According to journalist Prem Thakker writing for independent outlet Zeteo News, who spoke to a wide swath of students targeted by this policy, this is “a likelihood affirmed by university officials, students, and attorneys Zeteo has spoken with.”

These visa revocations, which have taken place over the past few days of early April, are reportedly done with little explanation or reasoning and feel “AI or computer-driven,” as immigration lawyer Jath Shao told Zeteo News. According to Shao, the execution of this latest crackdown feels like “someone wrote a program, like, okay if A, then B.”

The execution of this policy has been riddled with a sense of arbitrariness. One of Shao’s clients had her visa revoked based on being a domestic violence victim–not perpetrator–who was arrested alongside the other party involved in the domestic violence incident but was never charged with a crime. Other students have reported having visas revoked over minor violations such as a speeding ticket.

Could these revocations be driven by AI? Secretary of State Marco Rubio has indeed launched the AI-based “Catch and Revoke” program, which utilizes artificial intelligence to scour the social media accounts of student visa holders for potential support for Hamas or other US-designated terrorist groups. So-called support for Hamas has been used as a pretext by the Trump administration to target those who express support for Palestine. Many have raised alarms about this program, including Faiza Patel of the Brennan Center for Justice, who expects that such a program would be prone to “rudimentary mistakes.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It seems to me that the majority of the cuts and things like this are being done with AI. Which is not surprising given Musk's involvement. I wouldn't even be surprised if the data they're collecting is being used to also train his AI on X.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah clearly the data is used to train the ai and track and destroy every opposition they can the process will probably get automated you write something "bad" the Ai send the gestapo get you at work.

[–] vaultdweller013 2 points 1 week ago

Given how quickly LLMs output go insane it'd be more like writing "bad" and the AI sends the gestapo to fist fight the giraffe at the San Diego zoo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If it is, then perhaps people could ask Grok about those things and get real answers.

But yeah it looks like the tariffs likely came from ChatGPT, so they believe LLM actually thinks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think it's more that these people are lazy and stupid. Like the students that turn in crappy AI generated papers with made up references.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The ability to do terribly evil things while abdicating responsibility to a computer is almost the entire point of "AI".