this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1192 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

11219 readers
1589 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

What I'm saying is that if they can set "$0.50 above union rates" as the company policy for everyone, they can also set "$5 above union rates" as the company policy for everyone and then cut union rates by $5. It's essentially just bribing people to not join a union or penalizing them if they do. It being company policy for everyone is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

They can't cut union rates.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

sure, but whether or not they know it they have caved to the union's demands by doing that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What kind of 5th dimensional chess are you trying to play where penalizing someone for joining a union is "caving to the union's demands?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

if salaries depend on union decisions then surely they are following the union's demands.

i think the thing that makes it confusing is the missing context of whether unionised workers at that site are being paid less than non-union workers. i assumed the answer was no because it sounded like they had a CBA that the person was not aware of, since the alternative would have been immediately struck down by any union worth its salt.