this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
593 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5976 readers
880 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 days ago (6 children)

does NOT even live in the jungle

Fwiw, that's definitely not a requirement. The King of Australia doesn't live in Australia, either.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I didn't vote for him!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

our government says differently

so does our leader

same as the mobsters in blue

he IS your king. you'd do well not to forget it.

edit: i feel like this came across mean, i just mean it in a radical 'let's fucking kill the powerful' typa tone. :3

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well I didn't vote for him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah but our government is pathetic, fuck ‘em all really.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, it turns out that while strange women lying in ponds giving away swords may not be the basis for a system of government, conceited women fucking racist pricks is, in fact, a perfectly legal way to decide your head of state.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Oh king ey, very nice. And how'd you get that? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to imperialist dogma that perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any real progress...

Dennis there's some lovely filth down here!

Also:

Listen. Strange women laying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

What about that Plantagenet dude?

According to Baldrick he lives in Australia and is no less legitimate a claim to be king of england than any of those bastards since Dick III. The fact that he hasn't raised an army and started any wars suggests he might be less of a dick than most of them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain%27s_Real_Monarch

Oh - looks like he died, but maybe his offsping.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also, jungles' original meaning is just "uninhibited." So vast plains counted, too.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Jungle

1776, "dense growth of trees and other tangled vegetation," such as that of some regions in India, from Hindi jangal "desert, forest, wasteland, uncultivated ground," from Sanskrit jangala-s "arid, sparsely grown with trees," a word of unknown origin.

Source: Etymonline

I can't tell if you meant to say "uninhibitated" or "uninhabited." I get the impression you meant the latter, which would be in line with the idea of "desert" or "wasteland."

Either way, the history of the word jungle reveals that its root might have applied to what we'd call today a savanna, which is where lions live. So, the title "King of the Jungle" could have made sense for lions at some point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually the Indian Gir Lion does live in jungle/forest. As for the history of the word, the present meaning (forest) might've been used for longer by now (in India) than the old meaning.

And funnily enough, the Hindi word "sher" can mean either lion or tiger, although they do have a specific word for tiger, "bagh". And we do have the same title/phrase in Hindi which could mean either lion or tiger is the king of the jungle. I personally never thought it was the tiger because when I was a child, the Lion King had already been released.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's so interesting! I guess the meme is moot if the question is asked in Hindi, haha.

I get the connection with the Lion King also. Speaking of animation from childhood, I'm now remembering an episode of Rugrats where the phrase "King of the Jungle" became an argument. Except on that show, the argument was over whether the title belonged to Tarzan or to King Kong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Thanks for doing the research! Fun fact!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So Northern Canada is the Jungles?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So is a decent portion of the Canadian arctic

[–] prettybunnys 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Many parts of Appalachia are rain forests too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just learned some about that a few months back! What a trip. I saw videos of places that were more fecund than NW Florida!

[–] prettybunnys 1 points 18 hours ago

The east coast of the USA is actually really interesting as a temperate rainforest in many parts.

The Paw Paw is a crazy tropical tasting / seeming fruit that is endemic to the eastern half of the USA and much of Central America.

It’s making a comeback

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Below the tree line maybe.

[–] pelespirit 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Okay, this made me look up if Australia is still a commonwealth. It is, but who the fuck knew India still was? I'm not the only one who didn't know, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

fwiw the word "commonwealth" is...essentially meaningless. If you hear someone say commonwealth on its own, they're probably talking about the Commonwealth of Nations as @[email protected] described. The Commonwealth of Nations is basically a loose grouping of countries that do various things together. Probably the most noteworthy thing they do together is the Commonwealth Games, a sort of mini-Olympics.

But several other things also use the word. There's the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a grouping of former Soviet states. There's Australia, a country whose full name (in the way the full name of America is the United States of America) is the Commonwealth of Australia (and in Australia, "the Commonwealth" is sometimes used synonymously with "the federal Government"). There are several states in America which are properly termed commonwealths, such as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

India is not a commonwealth, but is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. Charles III is the head of the Commonwealth but not the monarch, he is separately the monarch of some (but not all) Commonwealth countries. Most Commonwealth countries are republics.

Australia is both a commonwealth (in name) and a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, but those are two separate kinds of commonwealth.

To summarise: All commonwealths are commonwealths but not all commwealths are the Commonwealth of Nations and not all members of the Commonwealth of Nations are commonwealths (although some are).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

he is separately the monarch of some (but not all) Commonwealth countries. Most Commonwealth countries are republics

Also fun fact, some members of the Commonwealth are monarchies, but with a different monarch than House Windsor. Like Malaysia.

[–] pelespirit 0 points 2 days ago

To summarise: All commonwealths are commonwealths but not all commwealths are the Commonwealth of Nations and not all members of the Commonwealth of Nations are commonwealths (although some are).>

Lmao, well that explains it! So this is how you remain a monarch in a democracy, hide yourself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's why 'von und zu' exists in German. 'von' means 'of House...', and 'zu' basically means 'resides in ...'. So King von und zu Luxemburg would be King of house Luxemburg who also lives in Luxemburg

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. So can someone be "von" multiple places? Charles von Australia und United Kingdom und Canada und New Zealand zu United Kingdom?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, generally European noble titles stacked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Was always pokemon race. Gotta catch 'em all!

[–] brotundspiele 1 points 2 days ago

Incidentally, in German the lion also isn't called king of the jungle, but king of the animals. But I don't know if that means von animals or zu animals 🤔.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

You call that a knife?