this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
326 points (97.9% liked)

politics

20298 readers
4265 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board criticized Trump’s economic understanding after he linked interest rate cuts to tariffs on Truth Social.

The board called his analysis "intellectual confusion" and explained that inflation concerns make rate cuts unlikely.

While defending Trump from blame for rising prices, the Journal warned that mishandling inflation could damage his presidency.

The article also noted Trump’s past comments about influencing the Federal Reserve, urging him to avoid pressuring Chair Jerome Powell, as inflation could quickly erode his high approval ratings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loaf 69 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You know it's bad when Rupert Murdoch's corrupt ass chimes in.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Murdoch is covering both sides. His NY Post is still a favorite of MAGoos in the tri-state area. It's been praising Trump for his bold choices.

[–] Corkyskog 6 points 5 days ago

There is probably more nuance to it. The Post ensures the base stays loyal, this is to guide moneyed interests to try to persuade Trump to not do everything he is saying.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Murdock owns a lot of media doesnt he? So just like trump, people talking and being engaged in the circus makes him money.

You guys following what they do, feeling something about it, commenting, its all building their wealth.

The ad-based economy is about eyeballs and attention from the ordinary joes like yourself.