this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
651 points (93.5% liked)

Political Memes

6592 readers
3984 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

A fantasy apparently.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I define it as one where everyone is equal and free. opinions may vary though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How can you have a society where everyone is equal and free if you don't define the right of individuals to be equal and free? There are always people and organizations who would give preference to their tribe, whether for well-intentioned or nefarious reasons.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How can you have a society where everyone is equal and free if you don't define the right of individuals to be equal and free

it seems pretty obvious that we can just observe whether everybody is equal and free, and if somebody is preventing somebody else from being equal or free, tell them to knock it off.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and if somebody is preventing somebody else from being equal or free, tell them to knock it off.

That's what rights are.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no, "rights" are an enlightenment era fiction created by people who were supposedly interested in empiricism, but never bothered to question whether rights exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rights are things that as a society we agree people should be allowed to do. And if they're prevented from doing them, we tell the people preventing them to knock it off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but we don't agree. the government infringes on so-called inalienable rights all the time. often without repercussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you agree that you believe in what everyone else calls rights, just that governments aren't perfect. Which nobody said they were.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no. I believe they don't exist, and the fact of infringement proves that. they are a fiction, and one that creates barriers to liberty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is such an idiotic take. They aren't a fiction. Sure, there isn't some sort of magical guarantee you have them, but that doesn't make the term or concept less useful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they are literally made up. there is no empirical evidence of their existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What in the solipsism am I reading right now. Multiple countries and international groups have things called rights. They exist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

do you know how I know that you don't know what solipsism is?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

it has no mass and no energy. it's a social construct, and it does not serve it's purported function. it's a fiction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When people are told to change their behavior, sometimes their response is just to say fuck off. How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with? How would you deal with conflicting values? As much as governments are the single largest cause of mass murders and deaths, this is the one thing they are good for: defining parameters.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago

How could we possibly expect compliance without codifying what they should comply with?

none of this necessitates rights

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are always people and organizations who would give preference to their tribe, whether for well-intentioned or nefarious reasons.

you can't prove this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Has there ever been anywhere in recorded human history where this wasn't true?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

this question is not proof.

[–] explodicle 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, then why does that sound nice? You gotta see where I'm going with this.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't care for your interrogative style. say what you want.

[–] explodicle 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I want you to understand how your concept of a just society ultimately depends on natural rights, whether or not we call them rights.

Why do you want everyone to be equal and free, why would that be nice? Why should we care?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want you to understand how your concept of a just society ultimately depends on natural rights, whether or not we call them rights.

no, it doesn't.

[–] explodicle 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

saying it doesn't make it true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do you want everyone to be equal and free, why would that be nice? Why should we care?

say what you want to say. i don't care for your interrogative style.

[–] explodicle 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am literally asking, and just explained why.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and I am telling you I don't care to be interrogated. I said what I wanted to say.

[–] explodicle 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It looks like I'm not the only person who's trying to explain this to you, and you're responding to everyone the same way.

Your idea is incoherent and you need to either listen to people or educate yourself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

you haven't explained anything, you've made unsupported claims.