this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
1642 points (96.0% liked)
Comic Strips
13570 readers
2236 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’ve gotten really wary of people when they start splitting hairs:
I mean.....yeah, ok. You're not wrong in adding that one to the pile, but also it's really weird that was your instinctive go-to on this subject.
We're over here talking about genocide, and hate, and war, and death. You're over here like "Hey, don't forget how some people find looney toons sexy!"
Lol ok that's fair
Ouch, some folks ain't gonna like this comment
Oh I know. Im not sorry. They know why wanking to animal sex isn't right.
Drawings can't hurt you, dawg.
While I do agree, we definitely should not venture into drawing underage girls having sex. It's a drawing but it's still fucked up
Why bring that up? We're having a wholesome convo about bestiality and you gotta ruin it? Smh my head.
Never said they do. I'm just describing a certain subset of people.
I mean I'm not into it, but I would also not call sex between anthropomorphic cartoon characters that take on the qualities of animals the same as animal sex. It's basically mythical creature sex. I mean would it be animal sex if someone was into, for example, centaur sex? Because we're essentially talking about creatures that look somewhat like the animals they are supposed to be, but more more like humans.
I have yet to see a rabbit or a mouse that look especially close to Bugs or Mickey.
Again, not my thing, but I wouldn't classify it in the same category as bestiality and I would guess that a lot of people into that would not be into actual animal sex at all.
Im pretty sure you're not into it. But it's the same thing as little girl cartoon sex. It ain't right.
It's not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don't approve of their specific kink.
Yes I'd say centaur sex is beastiality. It's not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I'm not going to give anyone a pass because it's "anthropomorphic". That's a cop out.
Again- people actually into bestiality are promoting animal cruelty. These people are not. I have no idea why you can't see the difference.
It can not promote animal cruelty and still be disgusting. It doesn't need to be I/0.
But anyways, I don't want to spend my morning talking anymore about this subject.
Whether or not you personally find it disgusting and whether or not it is the same as bestiality are two very different things.
This is uncomfortably close to "men who sexually assault little boys" is a subset of homosexuality. It is not.
I disagree. If someone wanks to drawings of little boys, they are a pedophile.
Yet again, show me a mouse that looks or even acts like Mickey. You keep avoiding the fact that what they are into are not animals, they're mythical creatures.
Until you can show some evidence that what they are actually into is real animals that actually exist then you are just doing the "pedophiles are gay" thing.
I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles. Whether the mouse looks like Mickey doesn't matter. If it's being sexual then it's beastiality.
Anywhoo Im done with this conversation. I will noy be responding back again.
Yes, that is my point.
Similarly, by this "furries are bestialists" logic, BDSM and sexual assault are the same thing. I hope you don't believe that.
It isn't, but they're still wrong'uns if you ask me.
Enjoying watching animals having sex is beastiality. It is wrong, I agree.
"It's not beastiality".
"Well that doesn't mean it's beastiality"
Lol