this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
32 points (74.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8924 readers
446 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.

If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.

Wow that was such a garbage take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game?

No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it.

Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive.

Idc about your buggy checklist app.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.