[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

NASA also consistently provides new innovation and new science.

What will the dome keep contributing to society for the absurd electricity cost it takes to keep running? Advertisements?

Yeah, there not really the same argument.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Re-reading your comment I see where I misread yours and instead of scrutiny for some reason I heard not allowed. But funnily enough, people arguing that have absolutely replied to me saying that Ukraine doesn’t want to start a full out war with Russia.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I’m not sure you understood mine.

When you invade another country, expect that country to attack you in your territory too.

I said I don’t see why I valid target would be made invalid just because it’s inside Russia.

Then you went on about children’s hospitals, which you know, are not valid targets.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

What?

That’s the entire point. They haven’t been allowed to hit valid Russian targets inside Russia. That’s what they’ve been given permission to do.

You’re the one brining children hospitals into this.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

When the other territory is actively invading mine, no I don’t see how territory makes another otherwise valid target not valid.

100% of Russians invading Ukraine came from Russia.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

That’s still a lot of words to say nothing of actual value. Are you sure you’re not a. LLM?

For the record, it doesn’t matter if my ideas are better, it’s yours has to be better than the currently available models.

So again, with out any kind of testable theory, how can yours be better?

There is nothing stopping you from publishing a paper on this. But you can’t just postulate something to sound smart.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago

Because that sounded like a chat gpt answer.

In case you actually want an answer, is what observable effects would that have, and can we verify them?

If the answer is no, then it’s not a better theory than shrugging your shoulders and saying dark matter.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That’s an appeal to authority fallacy if I’ve ever seen one.

They’re doing proof of concepts, not mass production. They’re at best answering is it possible, not is it a viable alternative.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Please describe to me how someone who offered up changes to change “he” to “they” for them, and then the contributor getting pissy about “politics” is denying work.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even if it was, why did they get the edited copy? What else was edited for that version?

Would the studio edit something like that out and not tell the BBC?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Mmmmmm don’t know about that.

The Planck length is the minimum resolvable accuracy of the universe. That doesn’t mean it’s a building block like the electron is.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Airbus already has an A320 plant in Alabama. https://us.airbus.com/en/airbus-us-locations#:~:text=The%20Airbus%20U.S.%20Manufacturing%20Facility,aircraft%2C%20producing%2060%20aircraft%20annually

That plant is why airbus was brought in on the Bombardier deal. It was originally to make the C220 in that plant to get around import tariffs.

view more: next ›

wholookshere

joined 1 month ago