this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
32 points (74.2% liked)

PC Gaming

9110 readers
1085 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The game is an eight years old single player game. I doubt they had many people working on it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?

Like I get what your saying. It's not Ubisoft's fault.

But if they're not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don't spend money on a game that no longer works.

If they don't want that, than delist it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't want to discredit the reviews, just give more context to the situation. I don't think that there is any AAA dev that has 8 year old games at such a high priority level that they would fix any "posthumous" issues immediately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sure

But when people are replying to

https://lemm.ee/comment/17210238

Saying that anyone not calling out Microsoft is biased, is a bad take. And I'm not sure what your point of more context is needed?

A broken game gets negative reviews. I'm not sure what's biased about this.