239
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
239 points (98.0% liked)
News
23655 readers
3389 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you were killed in the same manner as Thompson, your killer would never be found.
Regular old people get murdered all the time. Sometimes in targeted assassinations. The killers get caught all the time.
The cops spend nowhere near this amount of resources, obviously, but saying the killer would never be found is nonsense.
Prisons are not filled with murderers who have only been convicted of murdering the wealthy.
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/crime-without-punishment-new-york/
Seems like it's pretty much a coin flip. Also (to no one's surprise) you get a much better chance of them catching your murderer if you're white.
Now of that I have no doubt. I was just saying the idea that only rich people's murders get solved is just not true. But apparently I misunderstood what the person I was replying to was saying.
I think the amount of resources expended is absolutely valid criticism. There are active kidnappings that have less mobilization than this fucking circus - there are times people are still alive and end up dead because cops couldn't give a fucking damn... especially if we open the can of domestic abuse.
There's also a non zero chance the police kill a 911-caller/victim/hostage/bystander.
I agree. It is completely valid. I thought My post suggested it.
That's still part of the problem with the justice system and prisons generally aren't filled with murderers.
Are you saying there aren't a lot of murderers in prisons?
And people really think murderers only get caught if they only murder rich people?
Because otherwise I don't understand the downvotes. I can provide so many examples of poor people getting murdered and the murderer going to prison. Is there really a claim that doesn't happen?
Again, the cops spend nowhere near the amount of resources on such murders, but that doesn't mean that they all go unsolved.
Definitely not. Simply that prisons generally aren't filled with a majority of murderers.
You're getting downvoted because this a bizarre extrapolation from my original comment. A ghost gun with a silencer, very little unintentional evidence, and a clean getaway is a hell of a case to crack. They barely managed it even with all the resources they used, and I have my doubts that Luigi is just a scapegoat. If you or I were killed like this, our murderer would not be caught.
It wouldn't have hurt if someone had explained that to me earlier rather.
But then this is the internet and courtesy is generally considered a bad thing in my experience.
Then I apologize for assuming you had the full context before engaging the way I did. You deserved to get a chance to understand before you got dog piled.
I want to be the change with this perspective, so I hope that only the downvotes were the outcome of this misunderstanding!
Thank you. I am glad you agree with me on courtesy. I hope more people do.
NYPD barely bats above 50% for murder arrests in a ‘good’ period - not convictions. 33% is abysmal given their absurd budget and frankly unconstitutional practices like stop and frisk.
You should look up the stats before making wild statements.
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/29/1172775448/people-murder-unsolved-killings-record-high
Which statement did I make that was wild? Because none of that contradicts anything I said.
I never made the claim that all or even most murders get solved.
This you?
"All the time" and "every time" are not even close to the same thing.
So again, your link doesn't contradict what I said.
There are constant murder trials. Do you deny that fact?
You're correct and I think your original statement was pretty fair - but "All the time" and other soft indications like that - serve poorly when we're discussing something as serious as murder. Most murders go unsolved and while a very significant number of murders are resolved if you happen to be talking to someone who has intimate knowledge of a family member or friend being murdered "all the time" is likely to come across as cavalier.
Our language gets weird around strongly emotional events (you'll get a similar response if, at a friends' wedding you comment "You know, most marriages end in divorce" even if it's objectively the truth).
So written by a person with a little bit of ASD and has similarly put their foot in their mouth in the past.