this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
374 points (93.9% liked)

News

23367 readers
2670 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“This is a collapse of the Democratic Party.” Consumer advocate, corporate critic and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader comments on the reelection of Donald Trump and the failures of the Democratic challenge against him.

Despite attempts by left-wing segments of the Democratic base to shift the party’s messaging toward populist, anti-corporate and progressive policies, says Nader, Democrats “didn’t listen.” Under Trump, continues Nader, “We’re in for huge turmoil.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's not about right or wrong, it's about the person weighing in.

I don't want to hear what Jill Stein has to say about it either. Fuck both of them.

And you people downvoting: would you want to hear Newt Gingrich's take? Even if this is what he said?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You should be saying: "Fuck Kamala Harris"

The Dems knew from day one that the economy was the most important issue to voters, because the vast majority of them are working 2-3 jobs just to barely make ends meet.

So what did they do? They ran a clearly brain-damaged candidate, and when he imploded on live national TV, they subbed in Harris, who spent two months just telling people suffering to be joyful, as if it weren't only condescending, but terribly bad policy and campaign strategy. Here in Missouri the $15 minimum wage passed overwhelmingly, but Harris decided to cosplay as a moderate Republican and talk about tax cuts that no one actually thought she'd follow through with anyway, because they've spent the last four years being ignored by Joe Biden.

And they kept harping on Trump's weirdness, as if they haven't already observed that voters do not care how weird he is.

Jill Stein and Ralph Nader didn't make these crappy political decisions.

The Dems did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Kamala Harris would not even be an issue if Nader hadn't spoiled the 2000 election.

Because Gore would have been president and everything would have been different.

So no, fuck Ralph Nader.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Gore lost because George Bush's brother, Jeb, invalidated a bunch of ballots and stopped a recount as governor of Florida.

Besides that, this argument is absurd as it would be just as valid to say that Gore spoiled the election for Nader and if Gore hadn't run, Nader would have been elected president instead of George W.

Quit trying to externalize the blame for the actions of the party leadership. These faults should have been clear to you in 2016 when they handed the White House to Trump, and again in 2020 when their candidate only narrowly defeated Trump (especially at a time when Trump had already wrecked the economy and COVID was skyrocketing and this was fresh on everyone's mind).

You seem to keep insisting that everyone else needs to adjust to meet you in backing candidates that keep losing when maybe you should be the one adjusting to meet others. Sliding further and further right isn't a winning strategy for Dems and that should be quite obvious by now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Gore lost by few enough votes that there are a multitude of people who could have acted differently to produce a win. You can pick and choose who you want to blame and everyone is right.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And if Adam didn't eat the apple, we'd all be lounging naked in paradise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you're comparing something that literally happened within the lifetime of most people here with something that's totally fictional?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought we were reminiscing about ancient history

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

2000 is ancient history to you?

Just how old are you?

Also, since you seem to think Adam and Eve counts as history, I think I understand why reality is an issue for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's a logical fallacy called an Ad Hominem. Where you don't argue against an idea, instead attack the person voicing it.

You're opinion of a person, doesn't mean anything to their argument. It actually works against finding truth and solutions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So then yes, you would like to know what Newt Gingrich's take is as long as it is a valid argument?

You don't think that maybe some people don't deserve attention in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good ideas deserve attention. It doesn't matter where they come from.
Your idea here isn't a good one, and no longer has mine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No one has a right to media attention just because they have a good idea. I assume if a serial killer had a good idea, you wouldn't want it on all the front pages. Maybe let them tell someone else and have that person bring it up if it's such a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Who said the person deserves attention? Even a right to it?
I didn't.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, well then I stand by my point. Ralph Nader doesn't deserve attention on election issues no matter what good ideas he has. If they're good enough ideas, he has plenty of media connections he can tell them to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then engage in the discussion at hand, rather than trying to derail it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You do not get to dictate how or why I post until you become a mod. If you don't like what I have to say, you can either block me or not respond. Ordering me to do what you want isn't going to work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not a dictate. Just a suggestion if you're interested in being constructive. Maybe I'm wrong about that.