this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
354 points (94.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35867 readers
2191 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 215 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Capitalism is all about short-term profit. These sorts of long-term questions and concerns are not things shareholders and investors think or care about.

Further proof of this: Climate change.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Funny thing is that capitalism accidentaly solves global warming same way as it created it - turns out renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel, and the greed machine ensures the transition to more cost efficient energy sources

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's a hopeful idea, but it may be too late.

[–] Bronzie 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Should not stop us from trying though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I seriously doubt it's too late, it's more of a question how much damage will it cause

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Alternatively: too late for who?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the previous accumulation of capital has centralized a lot of power in actors who have a financial incentive to stop renewables. If we could hit a big reset on everything then yes, I think renewables would win, but we're dealing with a lot of very rich, very powerful people who really want us to keep being dependent on them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are only slowing us down though. They really cannot stop the change, because solar power is simply cheaper than oil. Once governments stop subsidizing oil, the big oil companies will be done for if they haven't innovated by than. That is also one of the reasons why they are slowing us down, so they can buy more time to innovate and remain on top with a new, green business model.

I hope all the big oil bosses get locked up for crimes against humanity, but I think they'll just change their business model into something green and exploit us in some different way.

This is why they say "they're too big to fail".

[–] minibyte 3 points 4 months ago

Sort of like how Phillip Morris sells vapes now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

This is not "capitalism accidentally solves climate change". This is the effort of many people pushing for more development in green energy until it was able to be produced at a cost efficient way. From there, capitalism took over, as intended. For green energy to be be feasible, we needed it to get picked up by the capitalist machine, because the capitalist machine has all the power and infrastructure in place to make it into a succes.

I predict that the same thing will happen with large capacity, small size home batteries once they become economically feasible. They are on the brink of becoming profitable and once they do, they will become a huge success and help reduce energy waste.

Same thing goes for fusion, but we're a long way off making that economically viable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Last I heard, there were proposals already put forward that would quintuple the current natural gas supply. Even though it's more expensive than renewables.

The companies that got natural gas off the ground in the first place might not see a return on that investment for another decade or two. There's a reason every year demand for natural gas has been going up.

Back around the housing collapse, natural gas was being touted as a "bridge fuel" that could get us away from filthy coal and serve as a temporary energy source until we got renewables up to speed. Funnily enough, what's been built doesn't seem like much of a bridge because there's no plan for ramping down natural gas.

Colour me shocked.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

turns out renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel, and the greed machine ensures the transition to more cost efficient energy sources

Cool, when is that going to start happening? Because I only see a handful of electric cars and I see a whole ton of coal power plants.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Did you mean to say shareholder and corporate management? Investment itself (especially diversified) is completely about long-term performance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

These sorts of long-term questions and concerns are not things shareholders and investors think or care about.

Well that's not true at all. The vast majority of investors are in it for the long run.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Yup, economics are all about "LiNe mUsT gO uP!!!!!" It's infuriating as all hell for people that can actually see further than the tip of their own nose.