this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
319 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59622 readers
2980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 118 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Wow, a whole $1 million. They’ll notice that for like seven seconds.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They won't notice, as fines are already in the cost projections.

[–] OberonSwanson 33 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The depressing fact this is already in their calculations really suggests fines should be vary based on a percentage of the company’s profits, not a set number for all.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

If you do something illegal, and the result is a fixed fine, it's only "illegal" for poor people. Rich people dgaf if they have to pay fine/ticket.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Never profits. Must be revenue.

Companies have ways of looking like they don't make a profit, especially when it comes to filing taxes.

"Oh, we created a subsidiary in Ireland and, gosh darn, they charged us a gagillion dollars for this pen. We actually have a loss this year."

Beat

"Stimulus please!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I believe that is why people made such a fuss about the GDPR allowing courts to slap companies for up to 4% of their worldwide annual revenue. Whether or not that full extent is ever brought to bear against particularly megacorps is a different question, but at least medium-sized companies will probably avoid repeat offenses. I don't know how Meta felt about the 1.2 billion ticket either, but I can't imagine they just shrugged it off as normal business expenses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Or it shouldn't be a fine, but criminal prosecution for the executives responsible.

[–] Bakkoda 2 points 5 months ago

And have been passed on to the consumer in doing so.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The real punishment ought to be an atomic wedgie. For everyone who was a C-level for more than a month at that company in the last 10 years.

This ought to be the punishment for a lot of unethical business practices. You can't delegate that to a customer's wallet.

[–] BakedGoods 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Punishment should be for every employee, board member and shareholder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Board members, sure. Shareholders - punishment should be proportional to their stake. Employees? Not sure. At worst it should be similarly proportional. If you're on 10k and the big boss is raking in 1m, that's what? A flick on the nose?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No they won't, but now they where deemed at fault, let the civil litigation begin. As this is the American way.