Spaceflight

640 readers

83 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

threelonmusketeers

[email protected]

Fifth helium leak detected on Starliner (spacenews.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/spaceflight

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But in SI you can easily (and metrically) translate it to volume/s, which would then probably be less cumbersome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

The volumes would be different on either side of the leak. Usually you standardise leak measurements to STP, and give it in standard cubic centimetres per second, SCC/s, i.e. 'how much fluid would be escaping if it were in a room at one atmosphere of pressure at 20°C'. Makes it easier to compare.

[–] WolfLink 1 points 5 months ago

Not volume/s, pressure/s