this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
477 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

5611 readers
835 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Truth is not empirical.

yes it is and where it cannot be proven with 100% certainty, the scientific principles applied to truth will at least get you as damn close to it as possible.

This statement reads like you want the right to replace reality with your own and say whatever you want without consequences.

That's not reality and you need to grow up

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think you misunderstand the point. No one is asking for legislation against stating the sky isn’t blue. When a general idea, such as “hate speech” is made illegal, the definition can be manipulated by those in power to do so. That’s exactly how past governments control the narrative of the citizens to their liking. All they need is our permission to tell us what is, and is not, acceptable to say.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Welcome to participating in society, where you are expected to work alongside your neighbour, not against them.

our government is supposed to be there to define these lines, in conjuction with the will of the people AND the limits of the courts.

Theres' valid argument about some parties abuse. But thats where a robust parliament with multiple different houses can help.

But at the end of the day, if you let hate speech fall under the pervue of freedom of speech and take an absolutist approach to freedom of speech, you will inevitably, lose tolerance as the intolerant will eliminate the tolerant. We have seen this enough times to know that free speech absolutism is a joke, and why it's not the rule of most countries.