this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
477 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

5611 readers
835 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I simply do not believe the government should restrict or regulate speech. Neither did the founders. They understood the power that puts in the government’s hands, and no leader should be trusted with that much control.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I simply do not believe the government should restrict or regulate speech

And my question is what should the government do to stop the inevitable spread of misinformation, hatred, and stochastic terrorism.

Stop being so wishy-washy and responding in meaningless idealistic bullshit.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m being as consistent in my opinion as one can be. I don’t believe the government should do anything about a citizen saying hateful or offensive things. What is illegal is unlawful action.

When it comes to broadcasting, it is illegal to spread misinformation (a fact proven to be false) or disinformation (a fact proven to be false with intent to mislead). It can also be prosecuted through a defamation lawsuit as libel or slander.

Listen, I’m not a fan of freedom of speech because I want to hide behind it while spitting venom. I agree that there’s too much hate in the world, and the internet brings it to your front door. I’m simply saying that giving the government the power to determine what is, and is not acceptable to say has empowered dictatorship after dictatorship throughout history. America won’t be any different. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m simply saying that giving the government the power to determine what is, and is not acceptable to say has empowered dictatorship after dictatorship throughout history.

And I'm saying if government isn't going to have the power to regulate speech then it will be hijacked by malicious actors.

Did I say 'will be'? I meant to say 'has been'.

Pick your poison. Do you want government to have that power, a government whose representatives you can vote for, or do you want to give that power to the billionaires and corporations?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re conflating speech and press. As I said in my previous comment, press is already regulated and legally bound to report true information. Freedom of speech is what’s allowing you to share your opinion on this topic, no matter how wrong it may be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Define press. Does a podcast or YouTube channel or Instagram/Facebook page qualify as press?

Edit: Should Marjorie be allowed to talk about Jewish Space Lasers without any response from the government?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not unless it’s accredited.

It’s important to be mindful of where you get your information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good to know that in your ideal world asswipes like Tim Pool, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh are free to spread hatred without any legal repercussions.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hate speech is illegal if used to incite hateful action.

I hate [group] people. Constitutionally protected and under attack.

We should harm [group] people. Inciting violence, and a chargeable offense.

You know these names, and to dismiss their message, because of their bigoted speech. Regulating bigotry doesn’t end bigotry. It just makes it hide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Hate speech is illegal if used to incite hateful action.

Then why are these fuckheads not in jail? Neither is Alex Jones for that matter.

Anyway it wasn't pleasant talking to you and I'm going to block you.

Get a spine and think in depth about your free market attitude towards speech.