this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16797 readers
667 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

“Early access” where you can play the game 48 hrs early if you buy the super deluxe edition is ridiculous

Honestly, that's a form of premium that I'm onboard with. I wouldn't buy it myself...but by the same token, I don't mind waiting 48 hours, so it has a very minimal negative impact on me. A game could just as easily have crashed into a bug and slipped release by much more than 48 hours.

And if you're getting a game 48 hours prior to release, you're at least getting a finished game. The curse of early access schemes is games that never really make it to a finished game. You're paying more, but you're still getting the product, and it's pretty easy to judge what you're getting and whether it's worthwhile to you.

Game publishers normally do have some form of leveraging price discrimination to get people who want a game sooner to pay more...but it's usually in the form of prices dropping over a much longer period of time, older games costing less. I don't mind waiting 48 hours. Frankly, I'd rather wait a couple of weeks anyway for bugs to be patched and reviews to come out. I care more about waiting five years (though there's the whole [email protected] crowd who intentionally wait a period of time after release, maybe a year or more).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

And if you’re getting a game 48 hours prior to release, you’re at least getting a finished game.

True. But, personally, I think it has all the downsides of pre-ordering but at extra cost. The game could be an absolute disaster (Suicide Squad, anyone?) and there's no way for anyone to know that. Not waiting to be able to properly inform yourself about what you're spending money on is so stupid.

I'm honestly reaching the point where I think pre-ordering games should be legislated against. Sure, it's only stupid people being parted from their money, but it's clear some consumers need protecting from themselves and it's only really the corporations that would lose out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

As long as we start rephrasing for what it is. Premium users don't get it 48hrs before release. It's released and anyone who pays can get it.

It's withheld from everyone else until the elites get their go at it.

[–] ryathal 1 points 7 months ago

48hrs of early access is also nice for games like MMOs, getting a chunk of people through starting zones before the masses is good for everyone. Competitive games can get more dedicated players out of the lower leagues a bit faster.