Technology

60062 readers

3367 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

630

FCC bans cable TV industry’s favorite trick for hiding full cost of service (arstechnica.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] conciselyverbose 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nothing better than Verizon advertising $65 a month, which is already too much, then when you actually try to sign up it's not just more; they straight up refuse to tell you what it will be (yes, I tried asking).

I know that's not cable but they both play the same games. No, it's not impossible for you to just tell a customer what you're going to charge them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So it's like going to the hospital. Arghh

[–] conciselyverbose 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The best part?

I ended up actually signing up for visible (Verizon has the best service in my area). It's Verizon, reselling their own service, for $45 with everything included. (That's 50GB before they deprioritize you. There's a $35 that's less but still fine for most people.)

It seems like it is actually possible to include those fees in their price.