stinky

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thanks for the edit. I'm validated to know that a double-read was necessary to fully understand my position.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com -3 points 1 week ago

Why do you think so?

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

thank you very much

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you're too sensitive if people asking for help looks like trolling to you. It's kind of offensive, to be honest. I'm embarrassing myself by admitting that I don't know what this thing is, and asking strangers for help, and you're telling me I look like a troll? Trolls are someone who invite discussion to be hurtful. That's awful.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 6 points 1 week ago

Your position is that Lemmy is immune to the following: company creates an account on Lemmy, spams communities with low effort content (possibly created by AI or automated processes), attracts viewers, then sells the account to another company as part of an advertising campaign. This position can be defeated if the above happens even one time. I'm refusing to debate you on this not because you're infallibly correct, but because it's not worth the investment of time. Any idiot can see it's an indefensible position. Have a day. 🫱

view more: ‹ prev next ›