stinky

I'm not

Arstechnica doesn't cite its sources? All it has are links to more Arstechnica articles.

The above article says,

In the US, the feds are currently testing whether existing laws protecting kids against abuse are enough to shield kids from AI harms.

..but doesn't cite any sources. There's an embedded link, back to Arstechnica. What the fuck?

I'm enjoying it as well - there's a lot of love here. The author has dedicated years of their life to understanding this phenomenon and how to address it; there's theory, practical uses and tons of documentation.

You don't need to match energy with fools folks. Keep doing what you love, even if inconsiderate braindead chumps give you a "No."

or wood chipper

i'll take two

no

DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN REPEAT DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN

THIS MESSAGE IS FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF PLANET EARTH

NO ONE NEEDS YOU TO BIRTH THEM

ABORT. ABORT. ABORT.

WE HAVE ENOUGH PEOPLE, THE PLANET IS BURNING, THEY WILL NOT LEAD GOOD LIVES. IT'S NOT WORTH IT. PULL OUT BEFORE YOU NUT HOLY CHRIST PLEASE DO NOT HAVE KIDS

if we go to bed at the same time he curls it up into a handlebar and DEVOURS my bussy

I live with an abuser and just getting out of bed is a monumental struggle