within your metaphor, "Abolish the fire in my house" ≠ "Put out that one fire in my house".
How does that challenge the premise? I'm saying that the unequalness of the two entities support the premise. Understand?
within your metaphor, "Abolish the fire in my house" ≠ "Put out that one fire in my house".
How does that challenge the premise? I'm saying that the unequalness of the two entities support the premise. Understand?
my guess is he had all the boilerplate written, and was using a single line or two of "working code" to show what the technology was capable of
but it's 4chan greentext so it could be fake and gay
jesus
that sounds awful.
I love how teachers take it personally that you don't want to do mandatory work lol. anyway. glad you made it out of there.
I get the sword in the stone reference. If we hadn't met on the toxic polluted battlefield of Lemmy rhetoric we might have been friends
Thank you for sharing an opposing viewpoint respectfully. I'll check out your articles.
In ASP.NET applications, specifically in ASP.NET Web Forms and ASP.NET MVC (pre-Core), the compilation process is dynamic and happens at runtime if source files like .cshtml, .aspx, and .cs files are present on the server.
ASP.NET uses just-in-time (JIT) compilation for views (.cshtml, .aspx, .ascx, etc.) and sometimes for code-behind files (.cs). When a request hits a page, ASP.NET dynamically compiles these files into temporary assemblies.
If there’s a syntax error, missing semicolon, incorrect type, or any other compilation issue, the process will fail and throw a 500 error.
I did read it and I'm trying to understand, but as I said it's not clear what your issue is. I'm sorry but I don't have any more time to donate to you. You've strayed dangerously far from the original topic and my reply to it so I'll have to leave you here to figure out where you lost us. Good luck.
I was asking the guy above you (who are you btw lol) about his question to me, as he has waffled back and forth between use of language and my main point, which is the abuse of power. This is because it (abuse) directly relates to OP's concern, in case you forgot what post you were discussing, and the use of language does not. K? :)
You're arguing against my position by challenging the metaphor... by saying the two entities are not the same. Honey that's what metaphors are used for. To compare two different things. This is tragic.
If it was founded I'm sure he'd be on the board
Ibuprofen? Sorry but please focus, I'd like you to respond to the message, not your immediate emotional reaction.