shadowedcross

joined 5 months ago
[–] shadowedcross 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] shadowedcross 2 points 2 weeks ago

Clearly didn't spend enough on planning.

[–] shadowedcross 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So many "competitors" coming out, but I still think I'm just gonna wait for the Deck 2.

[–] shadowedcross 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hopefully nothing to do with their wieners.

[–] shadowedcross 4 points 2 weeks ago

Can confirm, still suck at every PDX game despite a thousand or hundreds of hours in them.

[–] shadowedcross 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That 0.1% is the number of players who have the achievement, not OP's completion progress. But it's also probably very small.

[–] shadowedcross 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Others might be interested, but that'll be a firm no from me. Don't watch body horrors like The Fly as a child, people.

[–] shadowedcross 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If you were traveling at a constant 100 mph, it would take you 249 hours to travel around the circumference of the Earth, and 2,389 hours to reach the Moon. If the distances are actually accurate then these achievements should be nigh on impossible to get in any reasonable amount of time. That now 0.2% of players have them means the distances aren't accurate, that they used an achievement unlocker, cheated in-game, or have a fuckton of playtime.

[–] shadowedcross 4 points 3 weeks ago

Not necessarily. It's directly integrated into the program and platform that most PC gamers use, meaning it doesn't require any third party software and is probably easier to use. Personally, Geforce's solution stopped working reliably for me a long time ago.

[–] shadowedcross 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As far as I'm concerned, graphics programmers are wizards.

[–] shadowedcross 5 points 3 weeks ago

Thickness overload, good lord.

view more: ‹ prev next ›