You could probably get away with it in Japan or Korea, too. In Japan, they'd be glaring at you for saving your seat, and in Korea, an old person might sit on your phone or yell at you...but the phone would still be there
otp
I think what they're saying is that it shouldn't be in steps, the tax rate should increase as income increases.
So $11 would be taxed at A.2, $12 at A.4, $13 at A.6 and so on. And $11.50 at A.3.
As it is, it's more discrete than continuous (from a mathematical perspective). Another problem is that it usually stops. Like where I live, and it tops out at about $250,000.
Sweet deal!!
Limbo was alright for me, but Inside blew my mind. So if Limbo doesn't float your boat, don't stop there!
It reduces the onus on businesses and places it on the government (and this indirectly, taxpayers).
Better for small businesses to hire and thrive.
"But I don't want my taxes to go up!"
Maybe you just need more tax brackets. Where I live, for some reason, a specialized doctor making $250,000/yr is in the same tax bracket as some C-suit making $900,000.
I definitely need more tax brackets where I live.
I actually try to remember as few of my passwords as possible. Take away my password manager and switch my keyboard from QWERTY to DVORAK (and scramble the number pad), and I'm not getting into anything other than my email and 1 bank account.
Inside. Made by the same company as Limbo, but Inside is much more "don't look up a single thing"
Sometimes you need to know a bit about a game to know why it's worth playing
In the future we are going to look back on seeing children use iPads that directly connect them to the most sophisticated engagement and manipulation algorithms ever as something as horrid as a child smoking a cigarette, or doing any other drug
Are we looking at video games this way now?
Elon Musk's dad is Elon Musk's brother?
So you only
Not only that
I'm not sure what you missed there
Build another wall?
EDIT: Silly me. It's for tax cuts to the rich. Of course.
Lie + legal