kwomp2

Good movie - do a watch

You can just replace / with *, in pronouns as well: Seine * ihre, Kolleg * innen, jede * r.

[Edit: without spaces inbetween, but otherwise things become italic in here]

This way you are the surest, since everybody is included every time.

I really have no clue where your teacher got this mixing thing from. But all this is work in progress. Societies and languages have to transform and that doesn't need to be a linear process. Imo it's even better if it isn't, because exploration and multiperspectivity aren't very linear by nature and irritation and changes make for good opportunities to think and discuss.

For example sometimes I like saying just one gender, if it makes for good, well placed irritation.

*Die Stadt sollte designierte Fahrradstraßen haben, damit Fahrradfahren auch ohne Helm hinreichend sicher ist.

I don't know where you got this from or if you just invented it, but I have never heard/seen anyone mix * and /.

People interested in gender neutral language used / before the idea of more than two genders came up. Whoever wanted to specifically include non-binary people started using _ or *.

Also it makes little sense imo to include nb's in the subject of a sentence to go back to binary scheme in the pronouns..

It's a a mild form of misinformation to not mention it, imo.

We can and definetly should do better

Yeah that's a rough description. Not bad. But in terms of understanding my brain was looking out for an explanation

Endlich mal junge Leute die noch wirklich arbeiten wollen

Tldr something crazy, counterintuitive but the article can't be bothered to explain because you're too dumb to get it anyways. (?)

Please don't question this merit-dualism. I need it as my moral compass in these ever-expanding, complicated, almost mystical realms of the markets.

-- Calvinism or liberalism or smth (I don't know I'm not a priest)

Thanks y'all

Sounds amazing. What is the aproximate cost for all the parts needed?

Ich finds cool, wenn Leute, die nicht viel im Internet abhängen bzw. den entsprechenden Bereichen, trotzdem ein bisschen mitkriegen können was so passiert. Und dafür sind erklärende Beschreibungen doch eine gute Methode

Dann wissen sie etwas besser, was in ihrer Gesellschaft so abgeht, aber sie müssen nicht selber "im Feld" anhand von sich dynamisch entwickelnden Codes das Schnellebige analysieren (hast du ein mamer?).

Da erfüllt Journalismus doch seine Aufgabe