julietOscarEcho

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean some fraction of that market is for sure addicted, which possibly stretches the definition of "like".

[–] julietOscarEcho 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is frustratingly common. Who has the resources and incentive to run such studies?

Finding the same thing with evidence for the effectiveness of AI copilots. Everyone doing wonk on it has a finger in the pie. So in order to believe the research you have to trust the integrity and discipline of people you never met, not to mention trust a whole organizational to be culturally respectful of the scientific method (which probability near zero for a large corporate).

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago

This week too. How long do we have to watch the ball going through his hands 😭

[–] julietOscarEcho 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Flamekebab! Gorkamorka on lemmy! I guess I shouldn't be surprised there's crossover but pleased to see these fellas again anyhow 😂

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago

Moot thankfully...

[–] julietOscarEcho 50 points 2 months ago

"it's in the public interest" so all these articles will be freely available to the public. Right?... Riiight?!

[–] julietOscarEcho 3 points 2 months ago

Your painting is gorgeous but I can't help but mourn the loss of character from older death company kits.

[–] julietOscarEcho 2 points 2 months ago

Welcome welcome. And congrats on getting your mojo back this year.

Yeah, compare Jonesy to Zadarius Smith...

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago

Could at least have chosen something halal/kosher.

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago

Happy for the guy, but gotta hope marshawn Lloyd beats him out. Wilson's upside kinda capped isn't it?

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 2 months ago

Little did I know!

[–] julietOscarEcho -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The capital gain is the profit, the collateralized lending is the transaction completed to realize that profit. It's a logical extension of accepted understandings of those terms and easy to imagine coherent legislation to implement.

You don't like the idea, that's fine. But it's simply not true to claim that it doesn't make sense and you haven't been able to articulate any inconsistency. Just saying "nuh uh that's not profit" is pointless. We all know it doesn't constitute realized gain in the existing system of laws, but OP and others are suggesting it would a be a sensible way to tax the extraordinary benefits that the ultra-wealthy take from their appreciated assets. It's been explained to you politely and with sources, if you have nothing more serious to add to the conversation I'm done giving you the benefit of the doubt.

 

I made an inpromptu stop in silverknowles today and it was fucking delightful. Amazing live music and a shady spot to enjoy refreshments. Can't recommend enough.

 

Michael Howard today (on BBC radio 4):

The point about public ownership is this: if you have the industry in public ownership, it has to compete for resources with health, with education, with the police, with all the other legitimate demands on the public purse, and water when it was in public ownership was way down the queue.

People pay water rates Michael. This is an income bearing asset that could have supported other public programs. Instead it's been used to enrich the already wealthy at the expense of underinvestment in infrastructure, callous polluting, and the risk of damaging bancruptcy.

When you release it into the private sector, you have recourse to private capital. You can make the investment that’s needed.

Errr. Except a PLC's cost of capital is higher than the cost of govornment debt, so any investment is going to be harder to make and ultimately will cost the public more. As evidenced by the fact that they have done exactly the opposite of "make the investment that’s needed" over the past 30 years.

Dear god, he can't possibly be actually that dense. I have to assume he, and by extension his party that continues to support this stupid idea, is acting in bad faith.

 

I have my gripes but I agree with all of these. Looking forward to my first game next week!

 

I don't love free wargear (because there will inevitably better or worse options when everything is a straight swap whereas with points cost you can balance finely), but I can see that it makes life easier.

Fixed unit sizes, however, are supremely shit. All in all totally ripped the variety out of list building, which was one of my favourite things about the game. Lists now will look mostly identical.

 

"Just the way they're obnoxious," he said. "Just yelling and all that other stuff about things that don't even matter. Like, we're not even running a play, and you guys are talking about, 'Oo oh yeah, go Green (Bay).' Like, what are you even talking about? The game hasn't started yet."

What is he on?

 

Anyone else having a really hard time with crashes on this expedition? PS4 and close to giving up.

 

Enjoying what we've seen so far from the rules, if a bit disappointed by some of the loss of flexibility.

 

I'm seeing his TDF odds shorter than people like carapaz or oconnor. I definitely think he could transition to that type of ride but I don't see any indication of it this season.

 

Come say hi packer backers.

 

Keen to hear from anyone else looking for packer chat online. Anyone got any community recommendations? There's this one for general NFL

view more: ‹ prev next ›