There's only room for one Tucker Carlson in this world, my astoundingly-persistent-in-his-attempts-to-just-be-asking-questions friend.
jaemo
Yeah, right lest we forget, it's Kamala who wants to frack and not the industry, the pickup driving rig pig voters she needs or the lobby. What the FUCK ever. I can't roll my eyes hard enough.
All these yokels are like badly cooked souffles that eventually deflate into a soggy, somehow-grosser-than-before mess. As gross as Alex Jones was during his run, watching him come apart was even grosser. They're all rotten on the inside and it's like watching overripe fruit splatter when they hit rock bottom.
I really get why some people like gory, bad, cheesy horror movies now.
🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
Fucking lol.
Heigh ho. Have another downvote! Collect enough and maybe you can get a discount on that sanewashing detergent. You're using it at an alarming rate.
Cool but since you're such a smarty, you know that Harris is not the head of the current regime, so only a fucking idiot would think that voting for her is tacitly giving a pass to genocide, and only a colossal idiot would think Trump is a better choice, and only a titanic idiot would abstain from voting in such a consequential election.
Since you didn't bother even to gloss over the basics I assume you agree. On account of how very very smart and clever you are.
Pff. Who brought the new guy right? It's getting to the point you can't have Sunday afternoon baby BBQ and skull football game anymore. Whats happened to us these last few years?
I "understand" that they are opting out of almost ALL of the clauses in our shared social contract.
Do they understand the effects of this opt out? How the paradox of tolerance resolves for people who've literally had enough and see the opt out for what it is?
Because, for lots of us, once you're out like that, you're really out.
Easy perspective to have if you're a rich Webster. I bet a poor Webster would have less positive affirmations, but maybe in 20 years, poor Webster won a lottery and will have become rich Webster.
So it's kind of a 20 year time loop then.
Why not pay everyone fairly instead of incentivizing further corruption through bribery? I'm definitely not going to dispute that they should be paid for the quality and quantity of results generated in terms of legislation...
IMO government work should be volunteer, but you get your clothes, food, and living expenses paid for our of a set budget. You take no salary and accept no bribes, you live in "Government City". Essentially your finances go null entropy while in office. You do a good job? Public likes you? Private sector likes you? You're top of the list for top paying jobs when you step down.
But only AFTER you do the good work we need leaders to do for us.